Anchor selection is influenced by the specific composition of the ocean floor. Basically, we categorize the ocean bottoms into three groups:
*
Mud or silt, which varies the most in consistency and offers little resistance to forces.
*
Sand, ideally the most consistent, and where anchors specifically designed reach excellent holding efficiency.
*
Rock or Marl, poor holding ground where an anchor's dead weight is it's only asset.
The efficiency of an anchor in a given test is expressed in terms of "Holding Power" per pound of its own weight, not in "Proof Test" which indicates physical properties of the material. The "Proof Test" involves applying a static load to the assembled anchor to test its structural design and material properties as related to the holding force.
The fluke angle of an anchor has a definite effect upon the "Holding Power". The flukes should enter the bottom at an angle that will allow the crown, or head, to penetrate to a depth which can produce maximum efficiency. Any anchor's performance is dependent first upon its ability to bite into the bottom through the plowing effect of its flukes and secondly upon its ability to maintain a continuous resistance to drag once it is implanted in the bottom. The angle of the fluke to the shaft should approximate 50º in mud bottoms, 30º in sandy bottoms and approximately 43º in various bottoms.
Other considerations in selecting an anchor should include convenience of handling, aptitude for taking hold, physical strength, freedom from fouling (all anchors do-but some in lesser degrees) and the influence developed by the chain's catenary-which absorbs shock loads and lowers the angle of pull at the anchor by its weight. Anchor holding power is also influenced by duration of drag, bottom conditions and the ratio between the length of the mooring line and water depth as well.
The anchor is the key to effective anchoring or mooring. It is essential to know what to expect from various anchors. The resistance of an anchor to being dragged through a soil has been considered as occurring in two stages: first, biting into the bottom due to the plowing effect of the flukes, and secondly, maintaining a continuous resistance to drag after it is planted into the bottom.
Holding Power is directly proportional to projected fluke area, and shear strength of the bottom material, and inversely proportional to penetration-area resistance. In many cases a smaller anchor with favorable fluke area to weight ratio is more dependable than a heavier anchor.
Holding Power for the two most widely used anchors are as follows:
Stockless Type anchors, in sand, develop a holding power to weight ratio of seven to one. In mud they develop three to one. The angle of penetration in both cases is 45º.
Danforth ® Type anchors, in sand, develop a holding power to weight ratio of twenty to one, with the angle of penetration being 30º. In mud they develop nine to one with the angle of penetration being 50º.
The depth of penetration in all preceding cases is compiled from three to seven feet in sand, and from seventeen to twenty feet in mud. All calculations incorporate a 0º scope angle.
2006-12-12 23:49:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hawk996 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anchor Holding Power
2016-12-16 09:52:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by money 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The below is from my book, "A Cruiser's Guide to Hurricane Survival".I cant get the table to transfer cleanly, so you'll have to look closely; examplethe force on a 40 foot boat in 42 knots is 2400 pounds
" We’ve all seen the tables: For a boat this size use this anchor; for a storm, use one size bigger’. Your correspondent doesn’t know where they get those figures; we got the figures below from the American Boat and Yacht Council. ABYC is a group of very serious engineers and architects. Their standards are the standards of the industry and are accepted by Lloyds and the U. S. Coast Guard, amongst others.
The data below was extracted from tests done to figure load on cleats. ABYC was quite emphatic that the test was simply a measure of the load on a line on a cleat for a given wind speed, nothing more. If a skipper is to assume that a load on a cleat is the same load as what’s on the other end of the line (like an anchor), then that is the skipper’s assumption and not ABYC’s.
Table 3
Design Loads for Sizing Deck Hardware
Boat DimensionsHorizontal load on boat in pounds
LengthBeam to 15 knotsto 30 knotsto 42 knots
(ft)powersail
105 4 40 160 320
156 5 60 250 500
208 7 90 360 720
259 8 125 490 980
3011 9 175 700 1400
351310 225 900 1800
401411 300 1200 2400
50161340016003200
60181550020004000 "
The long answer above me is very very good............just don't confuse the ratios given as weight of anchor/displacement of boat......if so, you'd have to have a10,000 ton anchor on a 30,000 ton boat!
So the holding power needed is a formula figuring the area to the wind times the force of the wind......and notice above that force goes up geometrically......2x the wind speed is 4x the force, 3x the wind speed is 9x the force!
2006-12-15 02:48:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by yankee_sailor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most anchors have been tested by putting a scale on the rode after the anchor was set and use the engine to pull on the anchor until it breaks free.
Anchor holding depends on size and style of anchor, bottom, and size and style of ship, as well as current, tide, wind and etc.
Chapmans piloting will give you types of anchors and what they will hold in which conditions.
2006-12-13 02:07:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by science teacher 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if you could since the seabed has all variations of silt and rock. I know the anchor has to lay flat with a lot of chain laying on the sea bed to have max holding power.
2006-12-12 23:40:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by bungee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It looks like HAWK 996 got 10 points, i was going to say the same thing,
2006-12-13 02:06:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by COSMO 4
·
0⤊
0⤋