What do you think about this mythological story?

Question

God doubted his own exsistence and wanted to see himself, so he decided to create water to reflect his image. He created water and looked upon it, but he did not see anything. He said to water, ‘’Water, I’ve created you for the purpose of reflecting my image, don’t you know your purpose?’’ Water said it needs dust to reflect his image. Then he created dust and threw it into water. He looked at the water and did not see anything, so he said, ‘’Dust, I’ve created you for the purpose of combining with water and reflect my image, don’t you know your purpose? The dust said it’s not to be seen without light. So god created light and looked at the water, he still didn’t see anything, then he said, ‘’Light, I have created you for the purpose of shining upon water and dust to reflect my image,

don’t you know your purpose? The light said, it does not exist without darkness. God then created darkness in order to see himself. He looked at the water and saw the light seems more glorious and brighter. He got furious and punished the water, the dust, the light and darkness. He took light’s tongue, water’s taste, dust’s ears and darkness’s eyes. Then he abandoned them in eternity. That is how universe has created

Answer 1

I stopped reading after the word "God."

Answer 2

The story is simply created by any man thinking himself more intellegent then GOD. This is a story like all fairy tales and nothing else. Can be well understood by kids who need not to explain what they have understood.
There are myths in vedic stories where they have not directly told the truths and expresed them in a pictorial representation which needs decoding by experts. This is only done to hide the facts from stupid people to avoid any misuse of power hidden in those statements. There is a theory of Aeroplane
sudarshan chakra, atomic & automatic self power generating weapons But like nastodams future telling they are written in a way that layman will take them as a simple story for entertainment while if decoded there are hidden powerul farmulas in them...but that is not the case here.

Answer 3

Mythological stories reflect either a person's or a culture's understanding of the world they live in. In your story, its easy to fall into the trap of believing that because a person is named 'god' that the person is actually God. Because 'God' is being forced to react in the story, the speaker is attempting to illustrate how his 'God' is less powerful than the more elemental aspects which he is using to understand himself.

When God looks in the water and sees nothing, the speaker is reflecting upon a God that doesnt see itself in the very aspects of its own creation: it doesn't see itself in dust, in water, in light, in darkness. Thus, the God that claims itself as 'God' but does not see itself in its creations is not God, and therefore does not exist. The real 'God' is the one directing the false one to recognize itself. The 'real' God sees itself as water, therefore it can talk to the 'false' God and demonstrate how it is false. Likewise with the dust, light and darkness, each time the element instructs God to see itself, God cannot. It is no God, which is why 'God' disappears at the end. God really didnt disappear, only a false perspective did.

Answer 4

i think there is truth in myth. because surely there is myth in the truth

Answer 5

it is a stupid myth. if it were true, it would have been in the bible

Answer 6

anyway.
You are in my prayers..
<><

Answer 7

GO DARWIN WUT WUT