He's just another crazy (insane), political figure trying to make a name for himself in the history books at the expense of his own people. Only a total fool would follow this idiot.
2006-12-12 21:51:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by irmaynerds 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
he is by far the most dangerous person on the planet. The Iraq study group wants us to talk to him ? What would we have in common to say ? This is a perfect example of why the UN has become useless. I 'm sorry . another perfect example. This is how the US got started down the road to Iraq. Dictator violates UN. Dictator makes threats to other countries. Dictator supports terrorism. No body does anything. The US steps in and does something. The US president gets blamed for the whole mess. Until this world can unite against dictators that support terrorism, nothing will change.
2006-12-12 22:20:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by meathead 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
He is nothing more than a dictator. What is there to think? He represses his own people, has college professors removed from their jobs if they promote anything but the party line. Kids in college that protest get kicked out of school. He wants to destroy a nation and an entire race of people.
My grandfather was in Germany during WWII. The camps existed and anyone that says they didn't is an idiot and a liar.
2006-12-12 21:47:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by mark g 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
He is a member of the human race ,as are the rest of the Arabs in the world! His words might be a show of survival , in the midst of the massive killings of Iraquies, Palestinians, and others of Arab ancestry, he is put in a position of desperation, he knows he is dealing with the worlds only nuclera super power country, U.S.A.and its ally Israel, I would think if he has any proof of his words he must show them , then again let us remember the Jews of Europe ,and how they fare back then , and what is that makes Israel and its people so fierce in their land grab, I know that if I were a Jew , I would want a land of my own , so as tom feel secure , but it was not the Arabs who committed the genocide , it was Europeans of German ancestry! If only Arabs and Jews could understand that they in fact are first cousins, that there are much similarities in them , and that with respect and sharing they can come to live in harmony, because they will eventually deal with a common enemy and it is not them! As for mr.Mahmoud , he is a voice of the desperation he and his people are facing. Facts remains it is Israel who goes in Lebanon, Palestinians refugge camps and brings in the war machines from the U.S.A. to destroy , and maim , of course Hesbollah retalites but at a much lower scale, for friendship to reign in that region , the U.S.A. must back off, let both sides TALK, go live in one another shoes for a while! The situation is such it willl eventually get the whole world involved! By then it might be too late. Mr. Mahmoud needs to step out and see both sides , he might turn around and come to terms that the holocoust did happen ,but no Arabs were involved!
2006-12-13 00:12:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
"language he had no longer used so explicitly on condition that October 2005 whilst he promised to wipe Israel "off the map" i'm unlikely to communicate or maybe entertain this question. I in simple terms opt for to point out a actuality. The remark you talk of has been shown to be incorrect, it replaced right into a mistranslation, the incredibly translation. in accordance to Juan Cole, a school of Michigan Professor of modern center East and South Asian history, Ahmadinejad's assertion must be translated as: The Imam stated that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) ought to [vanish from] the website of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).[12] Norouzi's translation is same.[11] in accordance to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did no longer say he replaced into going to 'wipe Israel off the map' because of the fact no such idiom exists in Persian". instead, "He did say he was hoping its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, might fall down stop the war mongering and teach your self, do no longer believe the hype. And to characteristic to this, if he, like it incredibly is stated stated this, why might he on the instant pass on television whilst the remark replaced into introduced on television and say it replaced right into a mistranslation. I dint think of somebody could have this style of substitute of coronary heart in much less then 24 hours. source; wikipedia and the cyber web, and self exploration of information
2016-10-05 06:22:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think this man is more dangerous than George Bush.. If the U.N. wishes creditability they should ask Iran to consider their remarks and if they don't, throw them out of the UN! Its unheard
that a member state call for the destruction of another member state !! Not once but several times !
2006-12-12 21:50:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by dadacoolone 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's a lunatic bent on the destruction of Israel and the USA. The sooner someone rids the world of this guy, the better.
2006-12-12 22:55:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
An oddball and a loose cannon, but better to be a potential terrorist in the open than a real one in the cloak of darkness.
2006-12-12 21:50:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by A B B A 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Totally ******' crazy. Spokesman for the insane islamic leaders.
2006-12-12 21:55:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
he is a great man..as a russian,i like this guy..hs right about holocaust..i really hate jews..also hes not arab..no iranian r arab..they r persian..can we call americans mexican,just bc they r neighbor?
2006-12-14 09:57:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by anger remain 1
·
0⤊
1⤋