It's not the name that concerns me. If anyone has looked at this guys voting records. Makes me shudder. Not to mention some of his quotes, essentially calling all Republicans, people who won't vote for him due to political reasons, reacists.
2006-12-12 20:48:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jon M 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
you already know, it truly is an exceptionally reliable question, because he's rather a lot as undesirable as the different guy, if no longer worse. yet, i think this is because adequate of the electoral voters were paid off, and for the reason that it became McCain operating adverse to him. i personally don't have self belief maximum persons, yet when there are human beings you may have self belief, this is squaddies and POWs. McCain fairly did not represent the Republican aspect all precise, and accordingly, did not connect adequate with the voters he mandatory. he's fairly more desirable of a average than some thing else. on the different hand, if Ron Paul had gotten the nomination, extremely everybody would keep in innovations the call of community organizer from Indonesia as we communicate. President Obama is the face of yank Socialism in present day day society. If there is one ingredient all of us ought to understand, this is the evil's of communism and socialism, even though it type of feels the actually ingredient some human beings keep in innovations about the chilly conflict is a gasoline scarcity.
2016-10-18 05:31:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of this is not true. Senator Barrack Obama from Illinois. Once you listen to him talk, you hear how amazing he is.
He's not "half american" as one poster said. He is a natural born citizen. His father was from Kenya, and his mom was from Kansas. He was a citizen activist and state senator in Illinois, and before that he was a law professor, and the first African American to be the president of the Harvard Law Review.
He's absolutely brilliant. He is probably more liberal than B. Clinton (doesn't take much there) but his focus is NOT on partisan name calling, but rather in finding areas of common ground with the GOP to move the country forward. This is exemplified in his wonderful speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, which was reprinted as an appendix to his first book, "Dreams of my Father." He's also published a new book "The Audacity of Hope." It's a good read.
If you want to find out what he stands for, download his podcast. (Yes, he has a podcast)--listed in iTunes. Or check out his Senate website. Or read his books.
2006-12-13 00:36:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Perdendosi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't make fun of Obama! I'm very worried: will Americans vote in 08 for a candidate that is a Dem and has Kenyan blood from his dad and Hawaiian blood from his mom or another hidden in the closet Rep like W and be a bloody populist? Who cares about his race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.? And if you're a Republican voter, I wouldn't talk about being tolerant: the Christian Coalition is having a fit with Romeny because he's a Mormon. I'm a libertarian Democrat voter and think that in 08 we all need to worry about each candidate's issues. Start getting serious, we need to know who we vote for. And I can see all the smear ads against Obama if he wins the primary.
Example: " Obama: rhymes with Osama, mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, do you want that? Hussein: just like the ex dictator from Iraq, do you want that? Barack: rhymes with Iraq, the country we saved from tyrrany, do you want that? Do you really want to support somebody who has to much in common with Islam? Do you want him to be Pres and allow USA to be under attack again? Do you want him to end with our country? Don't vote for him, vote for a Republican as Pres."
That would be disgusting and totally inhumane. Sure, ads like this would fly like hell. I mean it, we should all look at our candidate's profiles and go with that. Romney might just represent many ideas that other pro-Christian candidates favor. It would be too low if we use race or any other factor less than issues to see who we vote for. By the way, for the record I'm a libertarian Democrat. I'd vote for him or not because of the ISSUES!
2006-12-14 11:40:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama is a senator from Illinois. The media and the democrats are in full orgasm for him. That is apparently what most of the US knows about him. When he gets out to campaign he is going to have a hard time pulling the wool over regular peoples eyes. I need more info concerning his ideas before I could vote him into office.
2006-12-12 21:19:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by fortyninertu 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
The fact that you would vote for someone based solely on their name screams what an idiot you are.
I would imagine his solutions differ from those of Bush: throw money and American blood at it.
Change is good.
2006-12-13 05:14:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by txwebber 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol well you were close his name is Obama. But you are right it is kinda weird huh. He is a 2nd term senator (I forget which state) who by looking at his voting record is very liberal, not moderate as some in the news portray him. But it puzzles me a lot of the libs seem to be having an orgasm over the dude. It's like I was just in the pressence of Obama and I've been healed!! But libs are always suckers for smooth talking tall men. I know it's not what they say it's how they say it. It will be interesting to see how Hillary chooses to fight him if she truely does run for the white house.
2006-12-12 21:02:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Question sounds a bit racist. I suppose you would vote for someone named Bubba Joe Nashville, even if he was an Islamic Terrorist, based on simple name recognition...
2006-12-13 00:47:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Voting based on a name.. that's the state our country's in?
2006-12-13 03:14:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Just Me 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You sound like a scared whiny republican. I don't think he will run until he has served at least 2 terms as Senator.
2006-12-13 00:35:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
0⤋