the current adminstration and its largest government in the history of this country.
You had both the house and the senate and you have created the most fiscally irresponsible fiasco this country has ever seen.
2006-12-12 20:11:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yo play marker ditto head just because you've got better grammer skilss than someone doesn't make you smarter than them, just more rhetorically articulate. 2nd brother I don't care what Rush says just because you say a lie long enough and loud enough doesn't make it indistinguishable from the truth. Bill Clinton's economic policies DID bring us out of a multi-trillion dollar defficit, and DID gove this fine nation a multi-billion dollar surplus that your idiot coke head drunk of a president turned back into a multi trillion dollar defficit in less than two years.
And why is spending on his war ro make daddy's friends money of no object but feeding the poor is?
2006-12-13 04:21:42 · update #1
Well they will rationalize it by doing what they did leave most bills for the next congress. When congress goes it it will have not choice but to raise taxes.
Another thing that should be pointed out is the could have cut spending. Done away with welfare! Don't know how many republicans whine and complain about welfare. Guess what it still exists with republicans in control. At least with President Clinton, he tried to change it. More then we can say for the republicans.
2006-12-13 00:13:31 · answer #1 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, first off learn how to write the English language so that you do not make George Bush appear to be a scholar compared to you. Secondly let's remember that Bill Clinton never erased the national debt he simply ran a budget that had some surplus while he was in office. He didn't erase 4 trillion dollars of debt and Bush didn't create 8 trillion more to get back to 4 trillion (which yes is higher now with the war in Iraq).
Your grammar is making my eyes hurt.
2006-12-13 05:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by playmkr278 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After 9/11, spending was irrelivant if we were being attacked on our home soil. We had to get the ones who attacked us. Now, 5 years later, the spending increases which were passed need to be rethought. we currently spend about $450 billion on defense and about $500 billion on domestic affairs. Perhaps we need to cut defense by 10% ($45-50 billion dollars) and redeploy it to paying down the debt. We do need to balance the budget. If it was not for 9/11 it would have been done.
2006-12-13 06:01:30 · answer #3 · answered by daddyspanksalot 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simple, they just say they are righting the wrongs of the previous administration. Clinton tried to curb terrorism but the Republican controlled Congress refused to pay the piper. We are now paying him big-time in money and lives. I actually pity the Democrat who is saddled with this mess.
2006-12-13 04:16:21 · answer #4 · answered by Gerald L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lucky Bush made those tax cuts huh The government needs the extra income they are generating to keep all those useless programs going. And it is kind of ironic that the repo's out spent the libs Bizzaro world indeed
2006-12-13 04:22:21 · answer #5 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is simple. There are no new taxes. And as for the Dems getting stuck with it, friend, you & I & our descendants are going to end up getting stuck with it, plus interest.
2006-12-13 04:19:07 · answer #6 · answered by bob h 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know, it's like we suddenly appeared in bizarro world.
2006-12-13 04:15:55 · answer #7 · answered by m-t-nest 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
...like that Congressman said on CNN the other day...
"this was the most USELESS Congress ever"....
EOM
2006-12-13 04:16:01 · answer #8 · answered by dorianalways 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋