They could only speak to the survivor if he himself was willing to be interviewed. My understanding is that he refuses to discuss the "event" due to loss of memory.He was left with severe head injuries in the crash.
2006-12-13 00:19:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't see it, but would like to. I'll try to find it.
One thing to think about, if Prince Charles couldn't be king because of his relationship with that other woman, who would take the crown upon the death of the Queen? ...Diana, mother of the eldest son of Charles. Diana would have been Queen.
Think about that...
2006-12-13 02:07:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The programme wiped the floor with the conspiracist's ramblings by producing credible witnesses.
They successfuly debunked each lunatic theory.
The driver was drunk.
He was driving very fast.
He lost control of the car.
That's it.
Only nutters think the poor woman was murdered.
2006-12-13 14:18:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think the BBC is trying to cover something. But I think it was an accident what killed Diana.
2006-12-13 01:45:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by sakaria h 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
they should have done exactly that asked a survivor then they would have the proof that it was murder!
2006-12-13 02:05:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No - I'm sick of hearing about this bloody topic!
Daily Express readers, get a life!
2006-12-13 15:29:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no, cos i am fed up with people saying murder when it was a terrible accident caused by a drunk driver.
2006-12-13 01:32:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't know what there would be to cover up. I am inclined to believe that it was an accident.
2006-12-13 01:35:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by profile image 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
No I haven't got a TV but I now have 2 extra points :)
2006-12-13 01:39:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Home_educator 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
Diana who??
2006-12-13 02:12:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by lolly 1
·
0⤊
3⤋