English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

after the long road of fixing the mess Clinton left behind, how much effort will they put in to destroying everything Bush has acomplished? How will they feel when they cut and run, and the terrorist follow us here and attack on US soil. why didn't Clinton take out UBL when he had many opportunitys? Why did Clinton Look america in the face and stright out lie, and why didn't Hillary condem what he said.

2006-12-12 17:02:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

pqrama is dead wrong,Reagan and Bush senior balanced the budget,Clinton just stood in line for the credit,Pelosi wont get much influence,Bush still has two more years for the democrats to blindly blame all the woes on him for. Clinton had the opportunitys but only chose to pick the one that would spin the media away from his Monica scandal(remember the aspirin factory)The scariest part is that most Americans can only remember about a week of anything than their brains turn to mush

2006-12-12 17:49:44 · answer #1 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 2 3

i imagine G W Bush 'lost' our way! individuals have continuously known a foul chief even as they suggested 1, yet till this election they have presently been too empathetic to do some thing about it! The Republicans and somewhat the Bush/Cheney crooks will ultimately do not forget that individuals are literally not the stupid, blind sheep that they took us for after this election! regrettably, human beings like Nancy Pelosi (and different Democrats with blinders on) will favor to benefit a similar lesson!

2016-11-30 12:35:59 · answer #2 · answered by binford 4 · 0 0

I won't say it. Seems like you are already giving up and doing a bit of cutting and running yourself. Chimpie and Cheney, ( the organ grinder ) still have nearly 2 years to do some pretty amazing things...but you are going blame their failures on .....Clinton? How about growing up a little and taking some responsibility for your party's screwups. This referendum was about Mr Bush and his War. But hey, 21 percent still think Bush is doing a great job in Iraq. In fact I would say they are doing a heckuva job. I loved seeing the Republicans fall under the so-called leadership of Bush.

2006-12-12 18:43:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hmm, let's see Bush accomplishments:

1. S(crewing the middle class; giving tax breaks to the wealthy. The middle class has been hit with higher property taxes and state income taxes and fees.

2. Virtually no improvement in six years, of employment levels and growth in the economy.

3. Totally mortgaging our children's future by financing a war without any other country's financial help.

4. Alienating allies world-wide.

5. Sending troops into battle on a lie in Iraq, cutting short the job that needed to be finished in Afghanistan, and not giving our troops the necessary supplies and armor to keep them from being blown to bits.

6. Overseeing the most unethical campaign money scandals since 1972.

7. Ignoring valid criticism from knowledgeable Americans and then vilifying them in public.

8. Taking care of the oil and gas industry, and other major contributors, instead of doing what is best for the country. Allowing the drug companies to write the prescription drug legislation and then having the GOP controlled Congress pass it. Who in the he((ll is going to pay for all of that ?

Quite frankly, Bush didn't take out Osama Bin Laden when he had the chance in Afghanistan.

Civil war in Iraq prevents us from making any progress there. Of course we should get out. 3 years hasn't done the country squat.

2006-12-12 19:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

When Clinton left office, we had a balanced budget and were paying off the national debt. The only thing he did wrong was he couldn't keep his zipper up like most men. Bush, on the other hand is a complete idiot and we will be paying for his war long after you and your children are dead. It has nothing to do with being a Republican or Democrat. Even if Bush was a Democrat, I would think he was an idiot. He will go down as the worst president ever, without a doubt.

2006-12-12 17:10:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

"If it were to rain a lot, there is concern from the Army Corps of Engineers that the levees might break. And so, therefore, we're cautious about encouraging people to return at this moment of history."—George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2005

Yeah, hard to do much better than that.

2006-12-12 17:18:48 · answer #6 · answered by melissa 6 · 2 2

The moderate democrats have made it clear from the get go that while they are democrats, they are not rank and file followers. I think it is a great sign of things to come. Liberals simply can not hold on to power at this time in our country. People are craving stability, even those slightly left. I disagree with you. The Dems will succeed in spite of the current party leadership.

2006-12-12 17:11:23 · answer #7 · answered by Griff 5 · 0 5

Georg W. Bush will be the one, for politics sake.

On the rest of your comentaey I will respond the same
as that hero of a Col. in the Ardine forest to the Nazis, "wink"
NUTS...
better yet, you are nuts!

Edit:

Do get you story straight:
Clintom lied about a Bjob, as you would have.
that's all

2006-12-12 23:05:30 · answer #8 · answered by dorianalways 4 · 0 2

LOL melissa, that was said after the democratic mayor told the people to come back and get new orleans open for business. anyone can quote someone out of context begone you twit!

2006-12-12 17:21:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Democrats will not fail as long as there are Republicans that can spell Pelosi's name.

2006-12-12 19:46:58 · answer #10 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers