English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does the Geologic time table would give some important details of how the existence of human begin?

2006-12-12 16:59:42 · 17 answers · asked by pyrrhus 2 in Science & Mathematics Biology

17 answers

there's heaps of people around that still look like apes. Isn"t that proof enough?

2006-12-12 17:02:30 · answer #1 · answered by sharkgirl 7 · 1 0

Darwin's Theory is not a proof of anything. Darwin made good observations and devised a good, simple explanation. The theory is the explanation. The observations are offered as the proof. It is undeniable that evolution happens. We may not see it in ourselves, but it can be observed in species with short lifespans. They go through many generations in a short amount of time. The example that comes to mind for me is that of a moth in England (I don't recall what kind). These moths were up until the 18th century white/tan in color. The advantage to this color is that they could blend in with the snow and trees so birds can't find and eat them as easy. But in the 18th, many turned up black. This is because of the Industrial Revolution and all the black pollution. The freak moths that were born black and that would have been the first eaten were now better able to hide. That's evolution.

So why say that evolution takes place for everything else except humans? It only seems logical that humans are a product of and subject to evolution.

Also, I wanted to bring up the Neanderthal. These human looking creatures COEXISTED with homo sapiens for thousands of years, walked upright, talked, hunted, gathered, all the things that humans do, yet they were a different species. Thankfully, homo sapiens had the evolutionary advantage. We took over the earth, the neanderthals were an evolutionary deadend.

Hope this helps.

2006-12-12 17:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by vidigod 3 · 2 0

You need to read more. Darwin never said man came from apes. He observed that similiar species had developed different ways to find food and survive.
Darwin believed that plants and animals changed over time according to their enviroment, and that life probally started out a lot different then people were seeing it in the 19th century. People with strong religeous beliefs believed the world was exactly as it was when a god created it. People were very upset with Darwin because he argued that something other then a god had changed people.
.
Science has gone further then Darwin and have shown that it's subtle changes in our DNA that can cause change as well. The fossil evidence indicates that man and apes have a common ancestor, but when and why we diverged isn't understood very well. There is now fossil evidence that shows that birds and dinosaurs are similar and may have had a common ancestor.
.
We know that the fossils of ape like creatures are found in rock strata that is up to three million years old. But so far only sandstone, slate and other sedimentary rock yield the fossils.
There are a lot of gaps! They do find artifacts in old caves, but how often do we find a million year old cave that no one else has looted? Rock strata like limestone and strata from volcanic eruptions destroy fossils.
So I guess we just have to keep digging!

2006-12-12 17:29:46 · answer #3 · answered by MechBob 4 · 2 0

It's a pretty vast subject, and kind of more info than I can cram into an answer, but the short answer is; "kind of."

It's not really that we so much came from apes, as we and modern apes have a common ancestor way back. If you go back further you can find a common ancestor between humans and whales, too. The fossil record is the most amazing timeline.

I think you might find some further reading on human history interesting. Hit the library and check out some books on anthropology and archeology.

2006-12-12 17:11:51 · answer #4 · answered by Emmy 6 · 1 0

The only place on earth where the "geologic column" exists is in the textbooks.

No proof for evolution has ever been found.

There are no "transitional forms", no "missing links".

The horse progression is a hoax, they have differing numbers of ribs.

The embryonic drawings of Ernst Haekel were found to be a fake 12 years after he drew them, by his own university, but they're still in textbooks today.

I recommend you study genetics. There's lots of practitioners of Darwinism, but generally speaking, they have never studied true science. When you study genetics, you'll understand that evolution is a crock. No new information is ever formed. The variations within a "kind" is a quality control mechanism, not an "evolutionary" mechanism. It keeps the breed strong, it doesn't ever change because no new information is ever introduced.

2006-12-12 17:11:22 · answer #5 · answered by s2scrm 5 · 1 2

Just was going to answer read Darwin's Theory. Another idea is Anthrophology. Here too we find the theory about origin from Apes. And why not look at the Gorillas how human like they are. Is it than so upsurd to think like that?

2006-12-12 17:02:43 · answer #6 · answered by angelikabertrand64 5 · 1 1

The Darwin theory is fake
Recent developments in science completely disprove the theory of evolution. The only reason Darwinism is still foisted on people by means of a worldwide propaganda campaign lies in the ideological aspects of the theory.

So we don't equal with apes
And, don't u know that our DNA is 60% similar to worm?
Don't u think that we came from worm??
Ehhm

2006-12-12 18:22:45 · answer #7 · answered by REI 1 · 0 1

we do not come from apes!! that has been long established... darwin only used the word because the skulll of the homo sapiens sapiens (modern man )resembles that of an ape...

we have evolved from the so called ancestral cyanobacteria (these are the bacteria that are believed to have created the atmosphere because they manufactured oxygen)the cyanobacteria evolved... forming eukaryote and prokaryotes.... these microbes evolved creating a sort of colony of themselves and fusing with each other under a common goal: to survive. they did this due to atmospheric changes (according to theory) after that there came the multi cellular aquatic organisms (since most of the world then was water) when land appeared these evolved into reptiles then to mammals then our ancestors appeared...and then we appeared with our concrete roads and sky scrapers.... THE CREATION STORY IN THE LIGHT OF SCIENCE

2006-12-12 17:10:44 · answer #8 · answered by AtsirkEiram 3 · 1 1

If we came from apes then maybe we would still be apes. Are you an ape? I know I,m not so why should I even consider such a half baked idea?
I hate to be rude but if you want to be an ape then eat a fuXXin banana.

2006-12-12 17:16:46 · answer #9 · answered by Radio 2 · 0 1

The fossil record contains many specimens of humans in an earlier stage of development than we. For example, homo erectus walked on two legs, made stone tools and used fire, but his braincase was smaller; the forehead sloped back from prominent brow ridges. Palentology is a fascinating subject for someone such as yourself to explore. There is abundant material in libraries and on the web.

2006-12-12 17:05:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

on the beginning of species does no longer state that guy got here from apes, it truly is a difficulty-free false impression. that aspect aside, it truly is believed that people and non-human primates (i.e. apes) percentage the well-known ancestor sahelanthropus tchadensis

2016-11-26 00:16:18 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers