English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

The Titanic was real, the sub-story is not

2006-12-12 17:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 13 0

The romantic story was fake but the ship Titanic really existed and sank like in the movie.

2006-12-13 01:09:59 · answer #2 · answered by tootsie 5 · 0 0

Perhaps that's the MAIN PROBLEM with the ATROCITY that was the motion picture TITANIC.....

There are a hundred stories that were worth telling, and James Cameron had to make up a stupid love story about a fictional necklace?

Idiot....

For the record...1997 was the worst year for movies, with the most undeserving actors (ha!) and actresses(w/e) winning the academy awards....begininning with:

Titanic - best picture....
KIM BASINGER!!!!!! - Best supporting Actress...ARE YOU KIDDING!!!! (RETCH)

And how does a movie that won best actor and actress NOT win best picture (As Good As it Gets)...

Horrible....HORRIBLE year....just awful...

Titanic was an awful movie .... James Cameron is an idiot...
And they should be ashamed for desecrating one of the most horrific events in modern history....Thank You White Star Line....

Stupid arrogant Brits...

Just my Opinion

2006-12-13 01:22:05 · answer #3 · answered by Christopher H G 3 · 0 1

yes youre right necklace is fake, titanic is real

2006-12-13 01:00:37 · answer #4 · answered by kevingolberg 2 · 1 0

not fake. the movie titanic was based on the true story of the actual ship titanic. look up the unsinkable molly brown.

2006-12-13 01:03:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers