English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other than a few lone voices, the US media is not saying a word. Why not?
Why is Iran being allowed to get away with threatening genocide against Israel?
Why isn't there a significant attempt to discredit Iran's leadership?

2006-12-12 14:18:02 · 16 answers · asked by Wonka 1 in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

This is just how nations behave. We tend to be wishful thinkers, that these problems will just go away on their own and we won't have to sacrifice our sons and daughters in a war.

When maniacs arrive on the world stage hellbent on destruction, the likes of Hitler or Ahmadinejad, the civilized world puts off dealing with them as long as possible.

2006-12-13 17:07:12 · answer #1 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 1 0

Neturei Karta's Rabbi Cohen said there was no doubt about the Holocaust and it would be "a terrible affront to the memory of those who perished to belittle the guilt of the crime in any way". (BBC report).
The term 'holocaust denial' means that a person does not accept that event has ever happened. It is unfair to use this this term for those who doubt about some part of facts. The term 'genocide' under no circumstances be used. Iran has over twenty thousand Jews. How Iran can think of genocide. It will better to read the statements carefully. I personally do not agree with the suggestions.
It is the right of younger generation of Israel and Arabs to live in peace without any fear and contribute for the world peace and prosperity of their land. They have been living together for centuries. Younger generation has better perception. Instead of provoking please help them. Sorry for any offensive remark.

2006-12-12 15:26:02 · answer #2 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0 1

Well...
If there was a room of severely retarded adults all sitting in a circle and one of them starts drooling and making funny noises and then another started making funny noises would anyone report on that? If I decided to have a farting contest with 20 of my best friends maybe and I mean maybe the Onion may report on it. Same kind of story. Have you heard from any news agencies on the farting retard story. No freaking way. It is SUCH A NON STORY. Same thing. Why didn't the group of "ARAB LEADERS" get together and discuss how can they could make things better for their people? For the Palestinians? For the Iraqi's? The Poor? Why? They do not want it better for their people. They want to suppress their people and make it hard on every one. Why waste such energy on such a subject. Even answering your stupid *** question is such a waste of time. So good bye.

2006-12-12 18:34:35 · answer #3 · answered by Harry Merkin 4 · 0 0

because the US has stuck its nose into enough peoples business that it had no business stucking its nose into. Who is the US to say anything to Iran, who is Iran to say anything to the US? Its CHILDISH, let the children do their playground fighting. Its NOT the business of the US to get involved the same as it wasnt the business of the US to go to IRAQ. When the US steps its feet into the situation of others affairs, it gets FECES smeared into them from its OWN peoples ignorance. I mean, point of americans being dumbassses now, how can a RACIST DAVID DUKE be supporting a man of COLOR???! Its like saying JUMBO SHRIMP. Or African American- youre either ONE or the other, you cant be both no matter how many times you say it, it doesnt make it true.

2006-12-12 14:23:37 · answer #4 · answered by . S 3 · 2 1

Because the world is being lead by a bunch of cowards. Hey, nobody was speaking out against Hitler until it was too late.

If our President said the holocaust was a myth, we be getting crucified.

2006-12-12 14:21:39 · answer #5 · answered by FRANKFUSS 6 · 0 0

We don't have diplomatic relation with Iran right now. And the president labeled the country 'axis of evil.' And his pushing for sanctions. I think many did condemn it publicly. It's not like he can just go up to Iranian president and slap his face.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061212/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_holocaust

2006-12-12 18:28:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I do not pay attention to what fool's have to say. History is history, I know of a 93 year old jewish man who escaped from
the holocaust when he was a little boy - hiding for a long time in a closet. It's real.

2006-12-12 14:26:47 · answer #7 · answered by floridagirl2 3 · 2 2

Because they are lying about the holocaust and it's a made up fantasy story.And why isn't the U.S. doing anything when israel commits genocide with U.S. made high tech weapons against the people of Lebanon and Palestine.

2006-12-12 15:15:08 · answer #8 · answered by zionistequalsnazi 2 · 1 3

there are a kind of books, photos, action pictures, eyewitness debts and files, that record the Nazi atrocities. There are certainly inconsistencies and inaccuracies in a number of them – deniers p.c.. on those inconsistencies as information of more desirable, undiscovered inconsistency or inaccuracy. it must be unnecessary to write down a e book refuting those middle inconsistencies – inspite of in the journey that they are equipped right into a wilder, illogical concept – because they do exist. at the same time as historic learn is riddled with opposing perspectives depending on the translation of events, commonly you'll locate that particular middle information are customary, because there is overwhelming information for them, it really is on the fringes of those information that disagreements and re-interpretations take position. between the most damning arguments to help the events of the Holocaust is that the deniers not often, if ever, look on the destiny of 5.5 million non-Jewish sufferers. there is an glaring reason behind this, although yet another is that there is not any justification for positing that the descendants and recorders of those 5.5 million had some thing to achieve from revealing the information of the Holocaust. One “concept” doing the rounds is that lots of the sufferers were no longer killed yet died of ailment – typhus (and that the typhus spread because the water provide were damaged by using Allied bombing so it wasn’t the fault of those fantastic Nazis – a sparkling canard). information from medical officials in the freeing forces refutes this, giving starvation because the significant reason for lack of life – even though it became a undeniable truth that typhus did exist in the camps and did kill distinct the prisoners.

2016-10-18 05:08:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because everyone knows that the guy's a whack-job...why waste time discrediting him, when he's doing a great job by himself, shaking hands with that as$hole David Duke?

2006-12-12 14:21:08 · answer #10 · answered by too funny 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers