2006-12-12 14:13:55 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Lets see if I can figure this out, she tricked you into putting your noodle into her t w a t , and now being the punk that you are, you are looking for a reason not to pay child support. You played, and you got your rocks off, not its time to pay the piper. In this case, don't try and get any sympathy from anyone. Be a man, if you can and take responsibility. Damn its punks like you that give all guys a bad name. Punk!!!!!
2006-12-12 14:19:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
Oh I guess she tied you down right? Firstly, if your not responsible enough to wear a condom then your not entrapped. Sorry but its just as much a mans responsibility junior. The fact that you would try to get out of paying for child support of your OWN blood child is enough to make me sick. You dont have to love the woman but to not own up to your child....your a loser. They are better off without you anyway.
2006-12-12 22:24:28 · answer #2 · answered by chcknbizkit 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
LOL!! what is that supposed to mean? like someone got preggers on purpose for an 18 year sentence of hardships and stress?
no one can get out of child support, for any reason...unless they drop dead.
i dont get the question, so here are some links that may help.
2006-12-15 00:32:37 · answer #3 · answered by Yvette B yvetteb 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, if a blood test confirms paternity, the father is held to be liable. For 'entrapment' to work, you would have to persuade the court that you were otherwise unwilling to have sex. Good luck getting any court to believe a man was unwilling!
2006-12-12 22:19:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
No. I fthe mother or courts want tpo collect ther eis no way out other than proving you are not the father.
It's the "you play and you pay rule". It's a fair one as any time you have sex unless you are tied up and raped you are responsible for any children as a result.
2006-12-12 22:21:38 · answer #5 · answered by hunter f 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No way! Not unless the guy was drugged or raped or otherwise proven to have engaged in sex against his will. Not likely buddy! You do the deed you pay the consequences!
2006-12-12 22:46:24 · answer #6 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you "helped" father a child, you're liable regardless. A woman can't become pregnant by herself. The baby is your responsibility, too.
2006-12-12 22:21:53 · answer #7 · answered by clarity 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It's time for the illusion to end: Everyone can stop pretending that sex and children are not related. Knowing this, you should be much more discriminating.
2006-12-12 22:20:24 · answer #8 · answered by limendoz 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nope. You may have a case for fraud, but that's even chancy.
Moral of the story: "I'm on the pill, honey, honest." is never enough. Wrap it up.
2006-12-13 19:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by John F 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually no it is not. That has been tried in numerous states and has always been overturned.
2006-12-12 22:16:18 · answer #10 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋