All I can say to your question is yes, yes, and yes some more. Bush is every negative thing you characterized him as being. He is a war profiteer, and as blatant as they come. He has an obvious disregard for the Constitution. The Patriot Act, and his condoning of unscrupulous surveillance methods, are all a testament to his will to marginalize the Constitution all under the pretext of national security. Funny, almost every aspiring dictator in history asked or demanded for the suspension of individual rights in exchange for greater security. Yet most right wing Americans are too dense to see this fact.
Environmental concerns are too broad and complicated for a man of Bush’s puny intellect to concern himself over. The science behind global warming is highly involved and requires extensive thinking; something George Bush is absolutely unaccustomed to doing.
Besides, even if he had the mental acumen to fully grasp the gravity of global warming, he and his cohorts are way too greedy to lose money on instituting changes that will benefit our environment.
So am I embarrassed by the fact that Bush is our Commander and Chief, given that he is in dereliction of duty in almost every aspect of his job? Absolutely! You know what I am even more embarrassed about? The fact that the American people are so credulous that they actually had the gall to reelect this man is the most embarrassing aspect. Bush maybe an idiot and unethical, but the fact that he is going to be in office for eight years, when as a democracy we could have prevented it from happening, is even a bigger indication of the overall idiocy and lack of ethics of the American people.
2006-12-13 07:26:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lawrence Louis 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
How can you take this man seriously or even respect him when he says things like:
"We will stand up for terror. We will stand up for freedom."
—Bush, speaking on the campaign trail, Oct. 18, 2004, in Marlton, N.J.
"The truth of that matter is, if you listen carefully, Saddam would still be in power if he were president of the United States, and we’d be a lot better off."
—Bush at the second presidential debate in St. Louis, Oct. 8, 2004.
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
—Bush addressing a group of witnesses at the signing of the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2005 in Washington, DC on Aug. 4.
"See, free nations do not develop weapons of mass destruction."
—So W., does this mean the U.S. is not a free nation?...
Source: The Chicago Sun-Times, Oct. 13, 2003
"We need to thin our forests in America."
—Bush, on the evil of forests, Aug. 11, 2003
Source: The Arizona Republic, "In Arizona, Bush Touts His Idea to Thin Forests," Aug. 12, 2003.
Anyone who can't see the man doesn't have a clue, doesn't have one either.
2006-12-12 14:56:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This man is not only quite possibly the worst president in history and an embarrassment to us throughout the world, he has so wreaked havoc on the United States constitution that you have to wonder if you even have the freedom to ask the question you've asked without fear of repercussion.
The entire civilized world is laughing at us - and with good reason. Did you see the UK papers the day after the "election?" “HOW COULD 54000000+ AMERICANS BE SO STUPID?" Oh, but wait - Diebold promised the election to Bush (manufacturers of the voting machines in OH).
Imagine for a moment if W. had been born to YOUR mom and dad ... instead of reciting the oath of office, it'd be "would you like to Supersize that?"
It will take years - if ever - to undo the damage that his presidency has wrought.
You may want to read Chris Hedges piece here: http://www.theocracywatch.org/chris_hedges_nov24_04.htm
2006-12-12 13:52:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pamela G 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
a million. it truly is a loaded question. 2. i don't sense Bush has traded in his honor and integrity for some thing. He nonetheless shoots from the hip only as he did after he gained the first election in 2000.
2016-10-18 05:06:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, you have been watching "An inconvenient truth" too much.
Al Gore said he invented the internet, and you want to believe him about global warming?
As for the President, I believe he is a good man, although he is not a conservative president. He has spent more than Clinton on pretty much all social programs, so I suspect if he was a Democrat you would love the guy. You only hate him because you have been told to hate him, and you have yet to reason rather than react.
Your evolution will hopefully continue.
2006-12-12 14:09:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eric K 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
well, considering he got us into a war that we can't win and has made the middle east hate us MORE as a result, i believe he has no honor. lets face it guys, he only went into iraq because he wanted revenge on saddam for his daddy. all i can say is, im looking very much forward to the day that his term is up.
2006-12-12 14:47:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by lizardgirl12368 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
George Bush is our president?
2006-12-12 13:54:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by ღimd14uღ 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I always thought that Bush was just a puppet in the hands of the powerfull lobbies : Jews, weapons, oil.
A special gift for you
http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=78944_Bush_Monkey_122_438lo.jpg
2006-12-12 14:02:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by kl55000 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
George Bush is a freakin idiot, too bad the pretzel didn't get lodged better
2006-12-12 13:57:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by fl_lopez 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's a question I have seen hashed and re-hashed over an over again - over the past 6 years.
I agree with you 100%
2006-12-12 13:56:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Haveagoodday! 2
·
3⤊
1⤋