I don't agree, and don't call me Shirley.
It's too bad we don't have a time machine so we could send geniuses like you back there so you could experience it firsthand.
2006-12-12 12:39:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
9⤊
0⤋
We would do well not to get too worked up about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He likely won't be Iran's president for much longer.
Of more concern to me are statements like "...in typical Iranian fashion, is ignorantly hateful of Israel." Is there such a thing as "typical Iranian fashion?" If so, then there are typical Iranians. A stereotype. Hmm. Haven't we heard this before somewhere?
Some of us have memories. Years ago, Israel's strongest allies other than the "U.S." were apartheid South Africa and Iran under the Shah. Ahmadinejad likely represents leftover resentment of those days.
It should also be kept in mind that what we have seen and heard about Ahmadinejad's statements and his conference have been filtered through the U.S. media, with their own translations of his utterances. It turns out that his most inflammatory remarks have been translated very creatively.
As far as his Holocaust conference, is it really a threat to anyone? If any real factual knowledge comes from it, so much the better. If not, then whatever attempt to refute the historical evidence of the atrocities will have failed.
What we should be concerned about is the use of this event to justify bombing and invasion of an entire country for the irresponsibility of its very temporary figurehead. If we are idiots, then we fall for this hype. Time will tell.
2006-12-15 14:55:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I am not a religious person, but i dont believe the holocaust was trumped up. I think you might be doin this for shits and giggles, but if your not, you need to go find some of the statistics recorded by other countries or someting, since your obviously in some ridiculous state of denial. I do agree that the state of Israel should not have been, atleast not where it was. That is something President Bush would do. What were the British thinking. It was palestinian territory, and they simply kicked them out, for no reason. And created a jewish state, in the HEART of islam. what the hell?
2006-12-12 12:49:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i would be unable to think of of a greater effective political speech in MY lifetime. And no, i'm no longer 6, i'm 36. And if the sole element critics can say is that it did no longer handle atheists or that it did no longer talk adequate of what makes him distinctive from an evangelical, i will stay with that. To do in any different case might pass opposite to Mr. Romney's use of a quote from John Adams ("Our shape replaced into made for a ethical and spiritual human beings.") and it would back be a digital religious attempt. it is not his place as presidential candidate to describe doctrine. As he stated "to realize this might enable the very religious attempt the founders prohibited contained in the form." to those bigoted evangelicals, get that by using your head and vote for the final candidate. to those clever and appreciative evangelicals, make your help even greater for Mitt Romney immediately.
2016-10-05 06:01:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by cosco 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparently, you wouldn't know the truth if it slapped you upside your head.
I can only assume that you and your hero Mahmoud are correct - and all of the history books, verifiable and valid evidence and the eye witness survivors and liberators are all in on this conspiracy.
And, for what it's worth, the Holy Bible has nothing to do with your question - your feeble attempt to put the answerer on the defensive wasn't worth the time it took you to type the question.
2006-12-12 13:11:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran's President wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and
smacked him in the head.
The reason he and that group of people with him are spouting those lies is to invoke a confrontation with Israel.
Are you so against the Jewish people that you can not see the
ruse? Are you so incapable of rational thought that you will
accept any ones explanation of what happened except the
survivors?
MERRY CHRISTMAS and have a nice day.
Thank you very much, while you're up!!!
2006-12-12 13:10:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by producer_vortex 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unbelievable that anyone who can use a computer would fall for the CRAP the Iranian President is pushing. There's a reason that Germany arrests people that preach this same CRAP.
If a country is truly in fear for its existence it ought to be Iran if they f@@k with the Israelis they'll be nuked by the Israelis.
2006-12-12 12:47:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by rjrmpk 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
How can you believe that the Holocaust was trumped up? That is just being ignorant and disrespectful to those who had to suffer through it. Iran's president is clearly a racist who tries to get what he wants by telling lies. DO NOT BELIEVE THEM.
2006-12-12 12:39:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by smartass 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Of course the Holocaust is fake. All 6 million of those missing Jews just decided to go on an extended weekend in Greenland together and haven't returned yet. Freaking Racist!!
2006-12-12 12:43:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Willie 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
Maybe you should go and live in Iran, since you like that President so much.
2006-12-12 12:48:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by mamadixie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not having much use for the Bible, I can't respond to the last question but I assure you, the Germans kept meticulous records of whom they sent to concentration camps and whom they experimented on or murdered.
2006-12-12 12:45:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋