And do you think Larry Siverstein had a significant role in it ?
2006-12-12 12:07:48 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is probably just "coincidental" that one was the sitting President at the time and the other one's company was in charge of installing the security system at the towers.
2006-12-12 12:12:24 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
yet another Bush-Bashing internet HOAX delivered to you with techniques from ugly Betty/Stephanie/ Vato/Chick/Hippie/Sgt BMF/Brenda/Ginger/bypass/Skipper/Surfer Dude/Lori /*/ boom/Jennifer/Jen/Lori/Luke F/Nick/Perry L/Citizen of the hot international/Neo-con Flavored Kool-Aide/ladyofnyc/etc. No data + No credible resources = Hoax save up the coolest artwork! you're a good American! awaken u . s . a . of america! awaken previously that is To previous due!
2016-11-30 12:22:36 · answer #2 · answered by brenneman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh gosh, not another dumb question regarding this.
It's high time the dems need to get over the fact that the President that they despise so much actually had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
Poor lost souls
2006-12-12 12:14:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I myself do not believe that the attacks were orchestrated by anyone in the US government. The simple reason is could you imagine the **** storm if that got out? And whether or not anyone agrees there would always be someone who would because of their conscience blow the whistle on such a heinous crime.
2006-12-12 12:17:03 · answer #4 · answered by ron k 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You still cannot debunk the laws of physics.
2006-12-12 12:14:00 · answer #5 · answered by Faux News 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When will you realize that this type of garbage does nothing but fill a garbage can!!
2006-12-12 12:12:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm a rational thinking, reasonable person.
So no.
2006-12-12 12:10:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
When are you going to get tired of posting lies?
2006-12-12 12:10:14 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
nope. none of them had any hand in 911
Debunking Sites:
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.jod911.com/
http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php
2006-12-12 12:10:40 · answer #9 · answered by arus.geo 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-12 12:11:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋