This commits the fallacy of:
a. argument from ignorance
b. irrelevant conclusion
c. appeal to appropriate authority
d. appeal to emotion
2006-12-12 11:45:30 · 5 answers · asked by Tanya D 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
well i would have to a ignorance
2006-12-12 11:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by quinton s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer is B. irrelevant conclusion.
'No one can prove that they don't exist' is the writer's conclusion. The conclusion however is irrevelant because no one can prove or disprove the existence of angels.
2006-12-12 12:53:26 · answer #2 · answered by honiebyrd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure that this is (a) argument from ignorance
It seem that the logic applied here is that of an indirect proof, which does not work in this case.
2006-12-12 12:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by blankstares 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no one can prove they exist
2006-12-12 11:52:39 · answer #4 · answered by dvwrg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Grantes there is no proof that they don't exist, but where's your proof that they do exist?
2006-12-12 11:55:17 · answer #5 · answered by sweetgurl13069 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋