in the game versus USC and UCLA.........
why wasnt the INT reviewed by NCAA officials???????
it seemed to me like every call in the season that had importance to a game was reviewed, even if we saw it was clearly the right call. but this time it looked like it had hit the ground before the player got possesion. i have DVR and i paused it and slow motioned it many of times. i recored it and showed it to many of my friends and they all agreed with me.
im not a USC fan, in fact i hate them.
im just saying the NCAA messed up and the PAC-10 messed up again....if you're gonna review every single call and then not decide to review a very big play that has national chanpionship possibilities thats wrong.....if you're gonna do it for one team you have to do it to every other team as well
2006-12-12 11:44:08 · 5 answers · asked by buddy_z34 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
i think it was already late in the game and the review had to come from the review booth upstairs
2006-12-12 11:48:56 · update #1
Better question. Why didn't the coach call for a review?? I wanted to see UCLA win!
2006-12-12 11:47:28 · answer #1 · answered by unicornfarie1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like either team personally.
I just think it was a bad call period. They should have reviewed the play either way, especially with how much they're enforcing the review this year in the NCAA.
2006-12-12 19:47:49 · answer #2 · answered by poeticpyr07 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Screw ups by the officials is something we just have to learn to live with. LSU beat Auburn but because of penalties not called when they should have been beat LSU from playing for the National Championship.
2006-12-12 19:49:32 · answer #3 · answered by Calill C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a bad job by Pete Carroll
2006-12-12 19:46:09 · answer #4 · answered by skysoxrock 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, i hated to see ucla win also but
it was clear INT...
2006-12-12 19:45:33 · answer #5 · answered by ilshdw 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋