They would write in fire hydrants.
2006-12-12 11:51:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr. NG 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Animals should have all the rights that interest them. The right to happiness, for example, is something that interests them. Dogs do not have an interest in voting, and therefore, should not be given the right to vote.
2006-12-12 11:28:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
In England a "dog" is a derogatory name for a female of the lowest order.
these "dogs" are allowed to vote.
2006-12-12 11:38:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by PomOnTour 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the past dogs could not vote because they couldn't operate the levers. With all this electronic stuff, it is to confusing for them. We don't want to blame them for "hanging chad's" in 2008 do we?
2006-12-12 12:49:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jim G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many 18 year old dogs do you know?
2006-12-12 13:45:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Vote for what?
2006-12-12 11:31:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
same reason/s why women cudn't vote.
i mean there is discrimination against dogs just like there was discrimination against women.
2006-12-12 20:02:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the donkey beat them to it
2006-12-12 11:26:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by burning brightly 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
They can't? They sure can run for office!
2006-12-12 11:48:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh, they CAN Katie, they CAN! You and your pooches will just have to move here to Chicago.
2006-12-12 11:33:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋