are they living? when not actually making any life choices? or are they dead b/c they dont make choices in scociety so then their exsitence is meaningless??..MIDTERM!! HELP
2006-12-12 10:32:59 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
The title of the play comes from a line in the last scene in Hamlet. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are a couple of mere pawns in "Hamlet" who are caught in the plotting between Hamlet and the King. Stoppard turns things around to show the events of "Hamlet" from their perspective. You could make an argument similar to what you're attempting here, by showing where their passivity leads them to their doom.
2006-12-12 11:12:13 · answer #1 · answered by injanier 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It somewhat relies upon on what television service you've. i do not forget that once you've Verizon FiOS, there's a thanks to video show it. Press the button with the movie star on it. Then bypass to seek, and then press ok. After that, in elementary terms style interior the decision of the action image. you'll then have ideas after that if the show show does not say that there are not any outcomes stumbled on.
2016-11-30 12:17:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are not dead,just literary characters, and as such they have no 'life' outside of what the plot demands of them...which isn't much...its about predestination and nihlism
2006-12-12 11:54:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
those characters are supposed to get hamlet killed read the play!!!
2006-12-12 10:41:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋