why or why not?
2006-12-12 10:32:19 · 6 answers · asked by CC 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No, the constitution is designed to protect the minority so makikng it easier for the majority to change it to suit their interests is counter-productive.
2006-12-12 10:42:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO!
It was made difficult so only the most needed & important changes could be made.
Most things can be handled by laws.
The constitution limits what laws can do. I don't want Congress to be able to pass anything that the constitution prohibits.
If it was easier, we'd be doing it every year.
What a pain would that be?
2006-12-12 18:42:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO...because the original framers of the Constitution were aware that the government must be difficult to move in order that some fool not get us in a giant mess
2006-12-12 19:06:14 · answer #3 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't think of any reason for why it should be "easier."
The Constitution should not be easily amended because we need to be able to see clear, comprehensive, homogenously-spread-out consensus that we do want to amend it.
2006-12-12 18:42:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! If it were easy to change the supreme law of the land, the people would have no rights and we would be living in a dictatorship!
2006-12-12 18:44:39 · answer #5 · answered by seekermike 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no , because then are politicians would take away all of our rights.
2006-12-12 18:40:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋