Germany's leader is a woman
France has a female presidential candidate
The US might be getting a female president.
Is this all good, or is there going to be another Margaret Thatcher (a horrible woman who was once the British PM)
2006-12-12 07:28:27 · 16 answers · asked by naughty boy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is no proof supporting the myth that women are less violent or more caring than men.
Think Winnie Mendela and her support of death squads which killed opponents by putting car tires around their necks, filling them with gas and lighting them on fire.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necklacing
2006-12-12 07:43:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There has been many female leaders in the past:
Elizabeth the 1st
Catherine the Great.
Boadicea
Victoria
They were tougher and more ruthless than most male leaders.
Female leaders are making a comeback maybe for the better.
2006-12-14 21:07:10 · answer #2 · answered by ian d 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it truly is time for women to be in cost for each and each and every of the excuses you've indexed. i imagine women ought to do a significantly better pastime of averting warfare. I note that women on YA have a tendency to furnish the purely right and maximum imaginative options to fixing the worlds complications. women have change into extra knowledgeable and look to furnish extra being concerned, inclusive and non violent ideas to help the international. i imagine women leaders contained in the previous were purely representitives of the adult males who were somewhat in ability. If women leaders contained in the destiny are not to any extent further puppets of adult males, then perhaps they could lead on the international in a significantly better route
2016-11-25 23:12:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does anyone actually think that it's the leader of the country that makes the decisions?
They are just a puppet.
It's the "men in grey suits" that formulate policy and make the real decisions.
I don't think there would be as many wars.
Just a lot of talking and backstabbing.
2006-12-13 21:41:22 · answer #4 · answered by notrightinthehead 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Once a month when the decorators come to paint the town red there will be so much tension and possible wars!
Seriously though, I don't think it would make much difference. Women maybe be more likely to use diplomacy than men but that it about it.
2006-12-12 20:48:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that men and women can both be effective leaders. It's cliche but it really depends on the person. Like you said, some leaders that are female aren't well-liked, but you can say the same for male leaders.
2006-12-12 08:14:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No not specially. Look to Germany now, not too much difference comparing to the previous male leaders.
2006-12-12 07:31:22 · answer #7 · answered by Abularaby 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the estrogen might be a good break from all the testosterone... sure we might have a slightly different focus on some issues... but, much like a bar fight.. sometimes we men get a little over focused and need a good woman to pull us out and give us a minute to breath so we can calm down a little :P
2006-12-12 07:31:39 · answer #8 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It won't make much difference. The issue should not be about whether the candidate is a woman or not. What we get will be based on the issues the candidate runs on.
2006-12-12 07:43:45 · answer #9 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as the woman has a sound-mind and strong backbone, she would make a great leader.
2006-12-12 07:31:43 · answer #10 · answered by MackDaddy10 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋