They have really similar clothes but there a few main differences- Hollister's clothes are really poorly made. They fall apart easily in the wash etc. but still cost the same as Abercrombie's. Another major difference- Abercrombie is aimed at an older, more sophisticated crowd than Hollister is (however, the exact same people shop at both).
2006-12-12 07:21:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by doristhecannibal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There isn't really much of a difference between Hollester and Abercrombie and Fitch because they are both made by the same companies, but to me there is only one difference, same cloths but Abercrombie and Fitch is more expensive than Hollester.
2006-12-12 15:23:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anna H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hollester can't be changed to anything funny. You can change Abercrombie and Fitch to Abercrombie and B*tch. Both stores sell mass produced, cheesy clothes. They are also overpriced. Wal Mart is better. Why would you want to write a paper on that? Write it on global warming or something.
2006-12-12 15:23:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're all for trendy/self-conscious retards who have no self respect or care how they look to the rest of the world lol. Or rich people looking for the worst way to spend money. And in certain stores you might just be able to spend a bit more than the last lol.
2006-12-12 15:21:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well since you asked i bet if you looked really hard i bet you will find out they are made by the same exact company! Simpally its like kornflakes and the cheap stuff at the dollar store if you know what that is! Made buy same company sold at difffernt store!
2006-12-12 15:26:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by out dated prod! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Abercrombie and Fitch has quasi-pornographic marketing that has been very controversial to some... I don't shop at either one though.
2006-12-12 15:21:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Heatmizer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are owned by the same parent company. Hollister is the "higher priced" version. Both are overpriced and overrated!
2006-12-12 15:21:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kristin B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is really no difference, they are both gay looking clothing for preps, yuppies, whatever you call someone with no fashion sense whatsoever.
2006-12-12 15:25:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
erm...why are you writing about two stores that promote the twin deities materialism and sex? why would you willingly promote that lifestyle? Think about what you stand for!
2006-12-12 15:22:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Girl with Kaleidoscope Eyes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Different clothes, different atmosphere, differnent music.
2006-12-12 15:20:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Krissa D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋