That depends. did the student try to learn? Did they listen and do the work? Whose fault is it that no learning was accomplished?
If a whole class of students learned nothing, then I would say that person is not a teacher. But a few students.... every class has them.
Sue
2006-12-12 06:54:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by newbiegranny 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A teacher is a person who is apt to teach or have the skill to teach something. In a broad sense anybody who teaches somebody something is a teacher. And our first teachers are our parents. Before I even met my first teacher, my mother taught me Sundanese, which is the native tongue of the Sundanese people in West Java , Indonesia, and my father taught me Dutch or Nederlands. On the other hand, somebody can be a graduate of a University with a degree in teaching a certain subject, but does not work as a teacher or is already retired from his job. He is definitely still a teacher and has all the rights to be called a teacher, guru, chegu, laoshi, doctor, docteur or professor, etc., depending on where he or she lives.
2006-12-12 15:25:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is like the tree falling in the woods question. If noone heqars it, did it make a sound? When a teacher teaches, students learn. They may not learn what the teacher was teaching, but they still learn. Therefore, your question is faulty because teaching implies learning.
2006-12-12 16:35:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by fangtaiyang 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as they attempt to teach they are a teacher. Think of Jesus and Mohammed and Budda, they taught tolerance, but no one really learned. They are still considered teachers.
2006-12-12 14:53:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by fancyname 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You didn't ask a logical questions. If a teacher teachers, then they taught. If no one learns, that's their fault. By saying, "teaches," you've implied that they've taught.
2006-12-12 17:10:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by theodore r 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on y no one is learning.Are they really a bad teacher,or is no paying attention?Just because you are not learning does not mean other classes aren't.Yes that person is still a teacher.That's like saying if a lawyer never wins cases is he still a lawyer?
2006-12-12 14:56:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by birdlady 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, but the students will still be donkeys.
2006-12-12 16:52:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
~NO~
2006-12-12 15:51:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋