Not exactly.
If you graph the function f(x) = x^2, you'll notice that it's a parabola, right? You'll also notice that it is not one-to-one, because it fails the horizontal line test, and thus is not a function.
We use our normal methods to calculate the inverse of the square root of x:
let y = sqrt(x).
To solve for the inverse, we switch the terms x and y, and then solve for y.
x = sqrt(y)
Square both sides
x^2 = y, or y = x^2.
So at this moment, it would appear that x^2 is the inverse of sqrt(x). However, for y = sqrt(x), the x values are restrictives such that x >= 0.
Therefore, the *ACTUAL* inverse of sqrt(x) is x^2, where x >= 0.
f(x) = sqrt(x)
f^(-1)(x) = x^2, x >= 0
If you graph f^(-1)(x), you'll see that it's half of a parabola, BUT it is one-to-one like all inverse functions should be.
2006-12-12 07:13:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Puggy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
X must be greater than or equal to 5. Explanation: To start off with, if X equals 5, you will have 5-5=0, and you can take the square root of that. you can take the square root of any number that is not a negative value. Even though 0 is neither positive nor negative (it is in the middle), you can still take it's square root. As for X being greater than 5, we will use X=6 as an example. 6-5=1 ---> and the square root of 1 is 1. Last example: X=9 9-5=4 ---> the square root of 4 is 2. ALTHOUGH: if you X value was equal to zero, you would have 0-5= -5, which does not work, because you cannot take the square root of a negative number. Also, for the part that says X is greater than 0, it is partially valid, but only if the X value is greater or equal to 5. EXAMPLE: X=3 Although, 3 is greater than 0, it is still less than 5. 3-5= -2, you cannot take the square root of -5. So the answer is the 2nd one: X is greater than or equal to 5. I hope you get it now :)
2016-05-23 15:18:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...X squared = X x X
square root of X = X to the power of 1/2...
the inverse of square root X is then X to the power of - 1/2, which does not = X x X...
2006-12-12 07:01:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The inverse of x^2 is written = (x^2)^(-1), which is x^(2*-1) or x^(-2) which is 1/(x^2) and not the square root of x.
Similarly, sqrt(x) is x^(1/2) and the inverse is (x^(1/2))^(-1) or x^(1/2*-1) or x(-1/2) which is 1/(sqrt x) and not x^2.
2006-12-12 06:53:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by slider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it is just like finding the square root ( sqrt ) f any integer
example : find the sqrt of 4
solution :
sqrt ( 4 ) = 2 you check this as you do any sqrt by finding what " x " Sqt is
x ^2 = x times x just as
2 ^2 = 2 times 2 = 4
2006-12-12 06:46:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
let us take a number say 4
square root is 2
square of the number is 16
so They are not inverse.
In fact [sqrt x]^4=x^2
2006-12-12 06:49:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by openpsychy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and no.
sqrt(x²) = |x|
As you can see, x² will always give a positive result, and sqrt(x) will also always give a positive result.
So, for positive numbers, x² is the inverse of sqrt(x). For negative numbers, x² is not the inverse of sqrt(x).
2006-12-12 06:44:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by computerguy103 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
f(x)= y = x^2
The inverse is:
x = y^2, solved for y.
y = (+/-) sqrt(x)
Since y yields two values for x, it isn't a function.
2006-12-12 07:30:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by S. B. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-12-12 06:44:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, it is the reciprocal
2006-12-12 06:43:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jet 6
·
1⤊
3⤋