THATS BECAUSE THE "BIG BANG" IS STILL A THEORY. IT CANT EVER BE PROVEN.
2006-12-12 07:05:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
This conclusion might be accurate if you were discussing the moments just after the Big Bang. Immediately after the explosion, all the particles may have been spinning in the same relative direction, however, we're now billions of years down the road.
All you need to change the direction of an object, its velocity, or its spin, is an external force, such as gravity, or perhaps a collision. Even collisions between molecules can affect spin; it doesn't have to be two large objects bumping into one another.
2006-12-12 10:51:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ruadhdarragh 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Big Bang theory has nothing to do with the direction planets spin. Our solar system is much younger than the age of the universe. In other words, the planets are not the fully formed debris from the Big Bang, they were formed much later.
2006-12-12 06:47:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by jeffrcal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Formation of the planets in our solar system happened about 8 billion years after the "big bang". There can be no correlation between the two. The fact that two of the planets in our solar system spin opposite the way the others do is being attributed to rediection because of collisions with early solar system objects.
2006-12-12 06:45:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your conclusions do not necessarily follow. It seems you are thinking in only two dimensions. There isn't really a defined "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" in space. An explosion (particularly that from a Big Bang) would promote spinning in an infinite number of directions - hence, some of the more spectacular images taken by Hubble of clusters of galaxies in various axis-alignments.
2006-12-12 06:44:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Finnegan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Apparently everything in the known universe was compressed into matter smaller than proton." what is 'Proton'? I know what A proton is! it is just one of the 3 parts of an Atom, the smallest substance known to man! who said any thing about a spinning proton? it was a Dwarf Star that exploded fool! what DOT?!?!?! this one here -------> . is that the one? "How come there are planets that spin clockwise, and some that spin counterclockwise?" can you not say "ROTATION"? you ever here of a thing called, an Axes? note: no, I still don't think that the Big Bang Theory is stupid, I KNOW it is intelligible, as it has proof to support it, what is there to support the existence of God? that he is just a hallucination, that came about in the heads of deluded men what, 800 years ago?
2016-05-23 15:17:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are making the assumption that an explosion only happens side to side in a 180 degree plane instead of a 360 degree sphere. Since it is spherical in nature particles will spin in many directions and if they collide with another particle that could change their rotation to be something entirely different
2006-12-12 06:46:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lauren 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
let´s put it a bit differently: provided that one celestial body (i.e. the Sun in our planetary quest) expelled matter around which helped later on in the formation of our Solar System´s planets, in an ideal, original focal elliptical plan, these planets do spin in the same direction; nevertheless, due to a very slight double precession movement of each focal ellipsis around its own axes of symmetry (like the case holds true for a very complex pendullum), along time the two inculpated planets turned upside down their focal plans and, consequently, reversed their spinning.
2006-12-12 07:09:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by f l 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, not at all. It is WAY more complicated than that.
2006-12-12 06:58:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋