Just for fun... I was wondering what some of you thought about this prospect.
2006-12-12 05:44:23 · 7 answers · asked by L80bug 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
Sure why not. As long as we aged slower I'm not sure how this could be seen as a bad thing. Unless you look at it from an over population view point. But I don't think it would make too much of a difference. You would still have alot of folks dieing young from smoking, drinking, accidents, murders.. etc etc.
2006-12-12 05:48:28 · answer #1 · answered by I Ain't Your Momma 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Because the average person over that age of 70 has 2 types of chronic illness. And its all downhill from there.
2006-12-12 05:47:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I plan to be pretty decrepit around 70-80, so another 70 years of increasing decrepitude would suck. The only people who can get away with that kind of advanced age are senators or royals.
2006-12-12 05:47:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The average life span used to be THIRTY YEARS
you have your children, you raise then until about the point they have children, you die. there's no mother-in-law bs to worry about, there's no decaying disease, there's no mother earth fighting back against overpopulation.
2006-12-12 06:00:56 · answer #4 · answered by Rebecca Laurin Simms 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell no. I don't wanna see my next birthday. And that's just a few days away
2006-12-12 05:47:30 · answer #5 · answered by Red Winged Bandit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-12-12 05:47:57 · answer #6 · answered by littlemoochild 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would, if I could be being healthy.
2006-12-12 05:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by naddel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋