Are all of the politicians and supporters of this war very stupid? 17 of the Sept 11th highjackers were Saudi nationals. Saudi Arabia is giving support, both financial and manpower to the groups killing Americans....why is this the elephant in the room no GOP or DNC member wants to talk about???
by the way, great job in liberating Iraq....you are doing a fine job....NOT
2006-12-12 05:31:10 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
jay r - you are stupid.
Saudi Arabia is number 3 on the list of killing its own population.
2006-12-12 05:37:51 · update #1
Walid - I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you - silly fool
2006-12-12 05:39:17 · update #2
Hey Jay R - you get put to death in Saudi Arabia if you are caught with a bible.
2006-12-12 05:41:30 · update #3
Hey Producer - I think that the British should have invaded themselves and Pakistan because those are havens for terror.
2006-12-12 05:42:53 · update #4
Hey Turbo - PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY
learn what it means.
You moron.
The US uses it all the time for things.
2006-12-12 05:44:05 · update #5
Obviously tinker is not thinker - McVeigh was raised in Western New York State, being born in Pendleton (near Buffalo) and received his high school diploma from Starpoint High School in Lockport, New York .
And we did actually bring in a majority of them for questioning..
Here is another for you...We caught him, where is Osama.
not much of a thinker after all, are you....lol
2006-12-12 05:50:04 · update #6
Hey yuppie - I've never been anti war....as a matter of fact, I kind of dig it.
But when you attack someone for false reasons that change everyday (iraq) its just stupid to be at war.
Saudi Arabia has wmd, its filled with Muslim Extremists. Killing 3000 in one shot is a weapon of mass destruction to me. (thats a reference to 9/11). I guess you only like to kill innocent arabs....must make you feel good about yourself.
2006-12-12 05:56:01 · update #7
Because the GOP is married to big oil, and the Saudis get us an awful lot of our oil.
The DNC doesn't talk about it because they're weak and ineffectual. Why they didn't do more to avoid war in Iraq is beyond me. At this point, no one wants to involve us in another war.
2006-12-12 05:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by chio 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The war is not about terrorism, it hasnt been since shortly after the US entered Afghanistan. It has been about Oil.
The problem with invading Saudi Arabia is that there are some very powerful, and very rich Saudi nationals there. Who own a hell of a lot of companies and people in the US. And who have a powerful influence over many politicians, two of which are George Bush senior and junior.
2006-12-12 05:37:29 · answer #2 · answered by david d 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Holden: my pal u did not comprehend the history of outcomes between Iraq - Saudi Arabia . Iraq replaced into beat Saudi in really elementary 7 - a million & 5 - 0 & 5 - a million etc.. very last beat replaced into in in Doha Dec. 2005 Iraq beat Saudi 5 - a million yet u comprehend the wars. ROoOROoO: truly ur humorous !!! u insult my crew Iraq then suggested: after that all of us Arabs !!. only examine the history and word who replaced into lost with techniques from different 7 - a million & 5 - a million etc... if u have perfect attack (12 objectives) in this tournamebt Iraq have perfect Goalie & protection (only 2 objectives in 5 suits a million comes with techniques from Penalty with Thailand) good luck to IRAQ & SAUDI ARABIA yet on the grounds that u began i tell u this truth: we can provide ur crew some training in genuine football like we did that with Australia . like Nashat Akeram provide this training in ur us of a. good luck IM ARABIAN and that i will"T experience LIKE LOSER IF ARABIAN crew BE THE CHAMP Edit: Shaima: it is the deleted question: Arabs the Kings of Asian Cup: IRAQ beat Korea & Saudi beat Japan: Iraq Vs Saudi in very last?
2016-11-30 11:50:40 · answer #3 · answered by endicott 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer to this is simple
1. Saudi Arabia has billions of dollars invested in the U.S. We don't want to lose the cash flow.
and 2. The Bush family has strong ties to Saudi oil.
2006-12-12 09:16:20 · answer #4 · answered by Barrett G 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bush family has had a long standing business arrangement with the Saudi Royal family and other business men. They are not about to bite the hand that feeds them! Look into this matter and you will find a lot of shocking facts that will really make you wonder about just whose side our leaders were on!
2006-12-12 05:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by moonlight_is_harmonious_1 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
OIL AND MONEY Saudi Arabia could put a direct damper on our lives as to where iraq wont and 9/11 isnt why where in iraq weapons of mass distruction that they house is why where there.....and to blow up schools and hospitals
2006-12-12 05:37:32 · answer #6 · answered by Lab Runner 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not that they were Saudis - it's that they were Al Qaida. Al Qaida is not supported or condoned by the Saudi government. So the silly belief that somehow Saudi Arabia should be attacked is mindless at best.
Perhaps you should try learning about what actually is the situation, rather than spewing silliness.
2006-12-12 05:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's what I've been saying all along too. Saudis are rich bast*rds who fund so much of the terrorist activity in the middle east, but when we ask them, they pretend to be our allies so they can rip us off and sell us their overpriced oil. If we attack Saudi Arabia, it would be like killing two birds with one stone, we can get the oil, and we can deter the funding of terrorist organizations.
2006-12-12 09:16:02 · answer #8 · answered by Tulip 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Am a saudi .. and the 17 hijacker's yes they were saudis..but saudi has a strict rule agaisnt terrorism ..it had its share or terrorist attackes too.. and by the way if any one in saudi is found to be linked to a terrorist group..thell be punished with jail.or execution because of the killing innocent people which is forbidding in islam
p.s.. please get ur facts right next time..
and iraq in all about OIL..
edit: i didn't get a response shame .. i would ov loved to see how u thout,,
2006-12-12 05:36:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
How do you know that 17 of the highjackers were Saudi nationals? We were only told that!
I think it goes much deeper than that. I do believe that they didn't half find out too quickly who was behind 9-11.
2006-12-12 05:35:13 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋