2006-12-12 03:35:45 · 16 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's called the Karl Rove Swift Boating Technique. It's under copy right protection. It can only be used by folks who have no issues, have no plans, are starving for more power and are completely without redeeming value. Like that guy at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Like the GOP.
2006-12-12 03:40:28 · answer #1 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Firstly, there are 0 Democratic candidates for 2008's Presidential primaries. Secondly, there's 0 smearing going on. Polticians smear themselves, simply by being dishonest. You should be less of a groupie for one party -- and more aware of the reality of 90% of them. (PS - Bill Bradley was the best Democratic candidate for President since Bill Clinton.)
2006-12-12 03:42:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the best way to take the focus off of the republican idiots that have preferred war and moving jobs out of the country is to smear the people who would like to reverse the trend of building up republican coffers and do something for the more deserving, needy people of this country
2006-12-12 03:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by carl.motley@sbcglobal.net 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the information media began speculating the day earlier to this that Don Rumsfeld ought to throw his hat contained in the ring, yet i visit't see that going very some distance. Hillary will easily run, yet I easily imagine that outdoors the few extremely-liberal states like long island and California, she ought to have a actual demanding time connecting with electorate. The DNC is acquainted with it too, and they'll attempt to stumble on a extra sensible, a lot less bipartisan candidate. as a lot as three have accused the Republicans of partisanship contained in the purely right few years, the Democrats have their responsible besides, and Billary is easily one of them (at the same time at the same time with her associates Polosi (sp?), Reid, Dean, and a slew of others). I choose Condy Rice would run, yet i visit't imagine she somewhat needs the pastime. i imagine she will locate extra pleasurable ideas of spending her time come 2009. I wager she is going lower back to education. McCain received't go everywhere in 2008 both. he's bured too lots of his bridges in DC and could no longer get the get at the same time's help till they purely can't locate all people more effective. Giuliani will probable run, even with the undeniable fact that it continues to be considered if he can bear the lengthy demanding highway of a marketing campaign for nationwide place of work. He had to drop out of the Senate race many years in the past for wellbeing motives. somewhat, neither get at the same time has a actual winner which will favor to run and has any wish of bringing abode the prize in a Reagan-esque trend. Neither get at the same time is going to get a mandate from the human beings, and in spite of who wins, we are going to nevertheless be listening to them blame one yet another for partisan politics contained in the close to destiny. it truly is early yet to really generate any functional hypothesis. i imagine all and dissimilar continues to be waiting to be certain what takes position next week before they initiate putting ahead intentions. this can in all possibility be yet another close race.
2016-11-25 22:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by mccay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrongo, it's the Democrats who are smearing each other. The nitwits in that party can't even get along with each other and it's funny as heck to watch all this infighting. Murtha Vs. Hoyer, Hastings Vs. Honesty, Clinton Vs. Obama, Webb Vs Politeness.
It's a lot of fun to watch. Kinda like WWF only without the same class and dignity.
2006-12-12 03:41:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Avery, it's as clear to me as daylight. The people of America have not been fooled by Tax Cuts that enrich the already rich. They are fedup with Christian based Religious morality that says do what I say not what I do. They are fed up with a Christian that sees no harm in facilitating the daily slaughter of innocent Iraqis. They are fed up with a Conservative that has bankrupted our nation.
I am getting more angry as I write this so I am going to stop now.
2006-12-12 03:43:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They're probably threatened. After all, the war in Iraq has been a dismal failure, and the results of the last midterm election show that the American people have had enough.
2006-12-12 03:40:07 · answer #7 · answered by tangerine 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Parties slur each other all the time. That's what they do. Always eying the next election. This is a shocking development?
2006-12-12 03:39:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's what they do best, and it's the only way they can have a chance at winning.
Only the republicans can make a war hero look like a war criminal and vice versa.
2006-12-12 03:38:07 · answer #9 · answered by Amanda S 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
They thrive on negativity and running negative campaigns.
2006-12-12 03:40:41 · answer #10 · answered by ropemancometh 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋