http://www.topix.net/content/ap/2514926106314093608118664321552664375627
2006-12-12 02:18:39 · 15 answers · asked by KellyRileson R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He is absolutely correct.
2006-12-12 02:21:10 · answer #1 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
For the uneducated Gordon Smith has always been one of the Republican senators that have always been a Democrat. It's the same with the Democrats who tend to be Republicans. I would think the Democrats would know which of these people are and how they lean. I mean it would make them look more intelligent in their insults.
2006-12-12 02:25:05 · answer #2 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
what's HClinton in recent times? an entire usa replaced into fooled via the substitute letter, a minimum of a few are civil sufficient to voice their evaluations Reps at the instant are not clones. GRT AMER; are you for the North American Union and the actuality people have had no say in it? are you for Border brokers being thrown in reformatory via a 'authorized' AGeneral Sutton and dope smugglers being pardoned? Do you think of ME experts who haved lived there are mendacity while they say US has made a large number of IRAQ and a lot of now have become a member of AlQueda in protest? Do you approve of Katrina & Kansas sufferers not having the fabric waiting with each and all of the money the adm is gouging out of the middle type--whilst the roles are dwindling? to end for now, do you watch for theNWO that 9/11 has made the path for?
2016-12-11 07:36:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're misquoting him....
He said that it is absurd and may be immoral.....
However, he is armchair quarterbacking. He is saying that he would have never voted for the war IF he had known the intelligence was inaccurate. Well.... DUHHHHH who would have?
2006-12-12 02:22:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think it is admirable that he counters his previous statements and basically admit that he was wrong before in an effort to save lives. I respect anyone willing to admit their mistake and despise anyone who wont. I do believe he feels a moral obligation to have made a statement and do not believe it is any type of political stunt.
2006-12-12 02:27:24 · answer #5 · answered by John H 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Great way for some idiot politician to get free air time.
2006-12-12 02:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I still don't see how we can think any differently than what he said. The facts speak for themselves. We went in for a fraudulant reason, changed the purpose for the invasion after we invaded and are still having trouble. Now we hear the 'if we don't fight them over there we will have to fight them here' line. The exact same line was used in Vietnam.
2006-12-12 02:21:33 · answer #7 · answered by toff 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
He's a politician. He'll say whatever it takes to get elected or re-elected.
2006-12-12 02:21:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'd say he's some obscure politician trying to get his name in the press. Why is it news?
2006-12-12 02:21:41 · answer #9 · answered by namsaev 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I dont care what anyone says about it. My job is to protect this country even if it costs my life. United States Army
2006-12-12 02:22:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
i agree. alot of things a criminal and not criminalized enough
to stop them, because the cowards in power have the resources
to buy free speech, oppress the righteous and take candy from babies and innocence from children and further profit from crime and terrorism.
2006-12-12 02:32:13 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋