Baker's law firm, Baker Botts, is representing the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?
You know--the 1 trillion dollar suit the families from the victims of 9/11 have brought against the Saudi Government?
Think some of James's Iraqi recommendations could have been influenced by this?
2006-12-12 02:14:03 · 6 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I have never and do not like or trust James Baker. He's one of those people you have to keep an eye on because he's always working behind the scenes influencing policy without ever facing an election or public scrutiny.
2006-12-12 02:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's hysterical that the cons seem to be the ones bringing up Baker's firms association with the Saudi's in an effort to discredit the report. They talk about the connection as if it's a new revelation. Progressive radio has been talking about it for years.
2006-12-12 10:46:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't you agree that Saudi Arabia is very much part and parcel of the Iraq Plot.I think war will end after Saudi Arabia is Dragged into war against Iran in Iraq But after a Blood Bath.IN OTHER WORDS SAUDIS AND JORDAN WILL TAKE OVER AFTER AMERICA LEAVES.
2006-12-12 10:29:31 · answer #3 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah it leads to proof our under class by majority the fighting soldier Is fighting the wealthy mans war and being told every lie but the truth to gain public support for our troops!
2006-12-12 10:27:35 · answer #4 · answered by bulabate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His firm is free to represent anyone they want. If you are implying conflict of interest, what proof do you have that his recommendations have been tainted?
2006-12-12 10:17:18 · answer #5 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes i agree someone in goverment should take a closer look at this issue
2006-12-12 10:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋