TNA isn't exactly crap but the fans talk about as if its the best thing to watch in the world.
Firstly TNA has the worst wrestling commentators ever! They are so boring. Another thing is that TNA looks so unprofessional it can put people off from watching it. TNA's video packages and promos are so dull and annoying to watch. When you watch WWE the show looks professional with great video packgages. The commentators are interesting to listen to
Some TNA fans say that TNA has better wrestlers which is not true at all. WWE has superstars like HHH, Undertaker, HBK, Cena, Orton whereas TNA only has Sting and Kurt Angle. WWE also has variation in wrestling styles, you name any wrestling style technical, high flying,power etc and be sure that WWE has it. On the other hand TNA only has the x division and washed up WWE wrestlers.Even the x division is getting boring with the same people involved with it every time ie AJ, Daniels, Senshi, Sabin. They all fight similar
2006-12-12 01:21:25 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
More proof that WWE has better wrestlers than TNA is the fact that WWE's worst wrestlers they release can go to TNA and become stars. For example Rhyno. DX vs VKM? How can u compare to losers like billy and bg who can't wrestle to legends like HBK and HHH. Not to forgetting that HBK is regarded as one of the greatest ever. TNA fans also complain about Cena alot but a fact is that if u take Angle and Sting out of TNA, Cena's name alone is worth more than the whole TNA locker room.
TNA fans also complain that WWE doesn't show enough wrestling, well thats why its called sports entertainment. That is also the reason it has many fans. Also If fans didn't know TNA is also sports entertainment, but TNA does not portray this very well hence the fact that they have under a million viewers per show. TNA hardly does any promos cos they don't have enough show time to.- its only 1 hour long. If TNA fans want to watch nothing but wrestling with no entertainment watch ROH or Japanese wrestling.
2006-12-12 01:36:54 · update #1
Amen dude.I don't hate TNA,but the fans made me hate TNA.They keep on talking that TNA is real and WWE is fake.WTF???Both are fake,WWE is more entertaining.TNA is like a sleeping pill,it can put you to sleep.TNA does have some good talent,I'll admit they might be better than WWE wrestlers,but they can't do what the WWE stars did.TNA wrestlers can't sell tickets.Anyway,you don't need a ticket to get into the TNA arena.LOL.I don't mind watching TNA,since I'm a wrestling fan and a wrestling fan watch all kinds of wrestling.It's just the TNA fans keep on trashing the WWE,which is annoying and they think TNA is real and calling WWE fake,which makes me really mad.WWE fans did nothing to TNA fans.
Bottom line,TNA ain't that bad,it's just the TNA fans.
2006-12-12 02:48:51 · answer #1 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree that WWE is better then TNA, but not by much. Pro-wrestling as a whole is dying and its getting stale because nowadays it lacks creativity. That goes for Both WWE and TNA, Vince Mcmahon continues to act like hes Gods gift to wrestling and he continues to do the exact opposite of what the fans want, thats why fans are turning away from the WWE, and then when they tune in to TNA they find out its nothing more then a bunch of WWE has beens who are just on TNA to cry about life and insult WWE, and the talent who are'nt WWE has beens are overated guys who have no mic skills such as Abyss, Somoa Joe and AJ Styles. And when this happens the fans tunes out wrestling completely and starts to watch UFC. Anybody who thinks Undertaker is a Bad wrestler is a MORON who just has a personal vendetta against the WWE. No big man can do the things that the undertaker can do, just go see Big Slow, Kevin Nash, And the great Khali. And Somoa Joe is an average in-ring performer that will never draw big money because he's sloppy looking and has no mic skills. His gimmick is supposed to be this intimadating unstoppable character lol, sorry i just don't see it . Kurt Angles injuries are catching up with him and he won't last too long, i'd like to see TNA rise up and really challenge the WWE but with they're lack of talent and money I don't see that happening.
2006-12-12 15:57:48 · answer #2 · answered by j.soto416 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is better because they don't make wrestling modern like WWE have which is WWE's downfall and they have better talent like Sting,Jeff Jarrett,Kurt Angle,Samoa Joe,AJ Styles,Christopher Daniels,Team 3D,Christian Cage,Kevin Nash and many more.Many WWE wrestlers want to go to TNA like Hogan,Kane,Chris Benoit,Jeff Hardy,Rey Mysterio and many more because they know TNA is better.The former WWE wrestlers that are in TNA left WWE because the WWE doesn't have a health plan unlike TNA and WWE don't give a S H I T about their wrestlers.WWE brought back ECW,DX,the Brothers of Destruction and the Hardy Boyz because they were losing ratings to TNA but non of those have helped WWE because TNA have still got the best wrestling.There are so many more reason's why TNA are better than WWE and if you can't admit that than your a loser!!!!.
I can guarantee you soon you will be watching TNA because either TNA has put WWE out of business or you will be fed up with WWE,if you carry on watching WWE than you are just stupid.TNA fans don't think TNA is real but they diss WWE because TNA is more realistic.
2006-12-12 17:51:48 · answer #3 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE Fans -That's who thinks WWE is better!
I am a TNA Fan & TNA is far better than WWE!
As far as commentators go, at least Don West & Mike Tenay actually know the names of the moves that the wrestlers do instead of talking about storylines the whole time.
WWE commentators just try to play up the storylines & plug the overpriced ppvs the whole time.
Just because WWE is bigger does not make them better than TNA. WWE fans are threatened by TNA just like WWE is & try to diss TNA just to make themselves feel better.
TNA is not boring. WWE is boring.
I almost fall asleep watching their programs.
TNA's video packages are better than WWE's too.
If you think WWE has a variation of wrestling styles, obviously you have been watching WWE for too long.
TNA have way better wrestlers, & matches. Many of TNA's wrestlers have more than just one style of wrestling, many of them use more than one style when they are wrestling.
TNA has better wrestlers & better matches, etc.
WWE has talented wrestlers but WWE won't let them reach their full potential.
TNA Impact! may be only one hour right now but is far better than all of WWE's programs put together.
WWE has superstars.
TNA has wrestlers.
There is a difference.
You obviously prefer BS storylines & talking instead of wrestling since you prefer WWE.
If you preferred wrestling, You would like TNA.
The only reason people know who more of the WWE superstars are is because WWE has been around longer. That doesn't make it better. WWE just proved they sucked not too long ago (EX. ECW December to Dismember).
For your information, TNA has more than just Kurt Angle & Sting.
TNA has Rhino, Christian Cage, Samoa Joe, Jeff Jarrett, & many others who are better in the ring than some of the ones that you described.
The X-Division is not boring. It blows away the WWE cruiserweight division. Any X-Division match can beat any match off of WWE even the heavyweights.
Just one more thing, TNA actually has a Tag Team Division.
Why do you think WWE brought back the Hardyz, the Brothers of Destruction, & Haas & Benjamin as tag teams?
It's because WWE's tag teams can't compete with the tag teams in TNA because TNA's tag teams are better!
TNA is new, exciting, & different & that's why people diss it!
It's because they are afraid of it!
2006-12-12 18:44:03 · answer #4 · answered by BKW 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE and TNA both sucks but I see TNA improving and even though WWE is the only thing I watch it is not nearly as good as it was a few years ago. I hope that TNA makes their product better and make pro wrestling interesting again.
2006-12-12 09:53:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
ok, you hate tna, let me tell u why i don't think wwe is great anymore: they use the same storylines, stupid storylines, overwork, oh, and why is it that i can almost always predict what is going to happen on a wwe program?? also, don't diss tna cause its only got an hr. ecw is much worse , but wait isnt that a wwe program?? i repect that u don't like tna but don't talk like its the worst wrestling program. its not tna's fault that they don't own and ruin almost the entire industry, they don't have the money to make all of the stupid stuff that wwe does and no, i don't think tna is the greatest, i just think for the most part that it is better than wwe
2006-12-12 10:01:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I totally agree that WWE is way better than TNA!
Being frank, TNA is rising and is becoming a threat to WWE. But as John Cena would say..."Back Off, Jack Off", coz' when you mock WWE you awaken a giant that's been sleeping from the time WCW closed. TNA wants to fight, WWE's gonna' knock them out cold. Yeah, they're good. They're talented. They're dedicated. But they're not as good as the WWE superstars. TNA's biggest asset is Kurt Angle, and they're getting so cocky over it.
Now VKM is calling out DX for a shoot fight this Saturday. I dont think DX will respond, but if they do, then the entire WWE is going to be pissed off. And I dont think BG and Kip would want guys like Undertaker, Batista, or Cena being pissed off at them. Let alone the ECW superstars.
So yeah, WWE rocks. TNA is something you'd watch when there's nothing else on TV worth watching. Final Resolution, so to speak,...lol.
2006-12-12 12:13:45 · answer #7 · answered by Rockafella 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Short answer is WWE have DX, Taker, Kane, Hardyz, RVD & Mickie James.TNA have Vince's cast-offs - VKM, Dudleyz, Brother Runt, Christian Rhyno, Christy & Gail.
WWE have the best talent cos that's what they are - the best. and if you believe the rumours AJ Styles is meant to be coming over to WWE.
2006-12-12 23:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be such an idiot. the wrestlers you mention HHH Undertaker, cena, orton, they are all borring to watch. who cares about them X Division is the best thing in wrestling after ROH.
also dont say that Japanese wrestling and ROH isn't entertaining, because it always leaves you at the edge of your seat, your whole question makes you seem like you dont know what you're talking about, and only watch wrestling for the soap opera quality stories.
2006-12-12 13:11:12 · answer #9 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm a fan of both WWE and TNA. But WWE is better though. I totally agree with everything u said
2006-12-12 10:01:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋