What were your thoughts on it?
http://www.thecourier.com/manifest.htm
2006-12-12 00:45:32 · 10 answers · asked by andylefty 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
yes perhaps he should have gone into politics.
2006-12-12 01:23:13 · update #1
I have read some of it. He seemed to me to have driven himself mad with the remorselessness of his thought processes.
2006-12-12 05:45:25 · answer #1 · answered by Huh? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I haven't had the patience to read the whole thing, but from a cursory examination it seemed to me that it was a document produced by a highly intelligent person who was utterly lacking empathy. There are many kernels of truth within, but the whole thing is strangely skewed.
I think the world is probably lucky that he chose the path of bombing rather than politics, because had he taken the latter path he might have caused a lot more harm than the deaths of three people.
2006-12-12 01:03:48 · answer #2 · answered by langdonrjones 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have not read it but one very good thing came from the unibombers manifesto. It got him caught.
The police printed sections in the newspapers and his brother recognised the rantings as similar to ideas that his recluse brother had ranted years before and gave his name to the FBI as a suspect and he was arrested soon afterwards .
He was found with his bomb making arsenal in his shack with him. Unfortunately by this time he had killed 3 people and maimed several more.
2006-12-12 01:07:47 · answer #3 · answered by selig 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the last few decades, Republicans have used the word 'liberal' for anyone they disagree with or any idea they don't like. Hitler was a liberal and so was Stalin. Terrorists are liberal and liberals are terrorists. In fact they've misused the L-word so much that it's lost its meaning. Now they're ramping up the rhetoric, calling Obama names like 'socialist' and 'marxist'. The idea all along was to marginalize liberals. When an idea or statement is discussed on right-wing media, if the host doesn't like it, he labels the source a 'liberal', meaning that he isn't entitled to an opinion so why would you listen to him?
2016-05-23 08:26:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I tried, but I kept falling asleep while reading it.
It is incredibly boring.
2006-12-12 01:07:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't read it.
He's a kook.
If he raises any valid points, let someone who is not a serial killer make them instead.
2006-12-12 01:27:09 · answer #6 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its too long. I tried but got sleepy. He should have cut to the chase scene sooner...
2006-12-12 01:00:17 · answer #7 · answered by stardust 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not interested in the ranting of a mad man sorry
2006-12-12 00:48:10 · answer #8 · answered by julie t 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope never read it, nor have I ever had the desire too.
2006-12-12 00:47:35 · answer #9 · answered by Need Answers 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no i have never read it .
2006-12-12 00:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋