English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

My backing for what?

2006-12-12 00:56:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO. It is bad enough that Brown is part of a UK Executive that exercises complete control over England when he himself is democratically unaccountable to the English people over vast swathes of Government policy, but when he becomes Prime Minister he will head up a UK Executive that effectively makes England a Scottish electoral dictatorship.
It is simply inconceivable that Gordon Brown should be allowed to become Prime Minister. He has no mandate to legislate for England and his high-office would be reliant on the English over-looking glaring constitutional anomalies for the sake of being governed by an electoral dictatorship of Government design and Scottish provenance.
A Brown premiership will result in a constitutional crisis that will make the UK, and England in particular, ungovernable. The English public and English MPs will, quite correctly, tell Brown that if he wants to legislate on education and health then he should do so for his own constituents by buggering-off and sitting in his own (Scottish) parliament. That is the way that it will be, this is our imminent future; an MP representing a Scottish constituency can not be UK Prime Minister; the Kingdom is dis-united.
Supporters of an English parliament should oppose Brown’s succession and send out a clear message to the Labour Party that under the current constitutional arrangement a Scottish Prime Minister is an untenable proposition. And those that support the continuance of Britain and the Union should know that when the prospect of a Scottish Prime Minister becomes untenable the Union is at threat. The Labour Party’s blithe contempt for democracy has led to this inexcusable situation, and if Brown and his supporters want to ensure his succession against a rising tide of anti-Scottish sentiment they must force the Government to rectify the constitutional imbalance. Until that time, and so long as 100 of us remain alive, we will not submit to the rule of the Scottish Raj, no matter how British they proclaim themselves to be.

2006-12-12 01:29:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Would Gordon Brown care one way or the other ? It seems unlikely. Moreover why would you want to ? Do you like being taxed ?

2006-12-12 01:46:39 · answer #3 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 1 0

Yes of course --- Let,s completely Finish Smashing the Country to Pieces

2006-12-12 01:03:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

If you want to vote for a lying thieving Scottish ba***rd then you will be sorry, because the men in white coats will come and get you. er you are aware that he is plundering England to prop up the Scot's ????

2006-12-12 01:48:13 · answer #5 · answered by David 4 · 1 0

If you do you have a short memory! The highest taxes ever,
An unscrupulous thieving of the pension funds of private
companies, Students leaving college with a mortgage before they start. "If you want to be a slave, till they take you to your
grave. vote labour!"

2006-12-12 01:17:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No,,but you could give him a slap with a large wet trout,,that's if Cherie Blair has finished in the shower

2006-12-12 01:48:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No he is labour scum a scottish traitor we should hang the man.In fact we should hang all politicians and keep the world extreme coz they don't do anything its all about the career and nothing else.

2006-12-12 01:41:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Quite simply No!

2006-12-12 00:58:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes

2006-12-12 00:46:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers