Interesting observation my friend, its totally a clark kent/superman thing except that Bush doesn't quite have a convincing disuise. kudos friend.
2006-12-12 00:35:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by olivia g 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
The antichrist will be a charismatic leader who rises from the middle east uniting the middle east in peace finally and abolishing all warfare, so why dont you start looking that way for the antichrist.
2006-12-12 07:32:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yah ummm...when is the last time you saw the antichrist anywere? This isn't really a fair comparison as thus far proof of the antichrist hasn't been established.
2006-12-12 07:31:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Faux News 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ever notice that Dan Quayle & Roseanne Barr were never seen at the same time, either...
Doesn't mean that Roseanne was the VP...
2006-12-12 07:36:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by amg503 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh so thats what Bush and Presidnt Tom were doing at the UN.
2006-12-12 07:38:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Banana,
Everyone knows that the antichrist is Bill Clinton
2006-12-12 07:31:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Albert H 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why do people ask stupid questions? You really must need some attention! Is this the only way you have of getting attention? You need to get a life.
2006-12-12 07:38:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by d3midway semi-retired 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush does not have the mark of the beast. That is the radical islamists who would have your head one way or the other. No difference to them.
2006-12-12 07:32:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have noticed it more in re: your dad. Funny how that works.
2006-12-12 07:34:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by pedohunter1488 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i had them both over for dinner a while back, afterwards we roasted marshmallows.
2006-12-12 08:33:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋