English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

olmert said that israel have nuks,but they NEVER tried or threatned anybody by using it,he is a BIG liyer,cause
israel was about to use its nuclear weapons, in 1973 when Egypt & Syria tried to get their occupied land back& that means that israel nuks is a threat to all Muslims & its not safe for israel to have these WMD if they tried to use it once,who knows that they will never use it???!!!So why Arab&Muslim countries cant have it to protect themselves from israel?
" Prime Minister Golda Meir and her “kitchen cabinet” made the decision on the night of 8 October. The Israelis assembled 13 twenty-kiloton atomic bombs. The number and in fact the entire story was later leaked by the Israelis as a great psychological warfare tool. Although most probably plutonium devices, one source reports they were enriched uranium bombs. The Jericho missiles at Hirbat Zachariah and the nuclear strike F-4s at Tel Nof were armed and prepared for action against Syrian and Egyptian targets"

2006-12-11 23:13:17 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

this is the source for these info:
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm

2006-12-11 23:21:16 · update #1

The only thing that stoped israel from using it against Egypt & Syria was usa & ussr

2006-12-11 23:34:20 · update #2

3 answers

Well because Iran doesnt worship at the feet of the USA like Israel does. Iran should try sucking up a little more. Look how well that worked for Pakistan.

2006-12-11 23:28:35 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 4 1

Because Iran does not WANT it for protection. Unlike Israel that regard this subject with a great vagueness (and never threat anyone with it, regardless what you say), Iran says loud and clear that it intends to wipe Israel off the map.
Further more, while Israel never spoke of an attack against Muslims in general and never mentioned a global religious war (regardless what you say), Iran's intentions are not aimed for Israel only, but for all Jews.

"A threat to all Muslims" is an interesting phrase in your question (i.e, propagandic monologue): on the one hand it indicates a huge ignorance and a serious lack of understanding of the situation (Israel does not view these conflicts with religious eyes, unlike Iran, Iraq, Syria etc). On the other hand it shows an inner fear, almost Freudian, I'd say.
I daresay that you're afraid of the unrealistic possibility that the Jews may do what many Muslim countries plan to do to the Jews for ages.

2006-12-12 16:13:01 · answer #2 · answered by yotg 6 · 0 5

It's really a shame that Israel went to all the trouble of preparing that strike and then didn't carry it out. The problems we're facing today wouldn't exist.

2006-12-12 07:16:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers