I'm avoiding the movie & making eveyone I know to just ignore it.
I hate the new actor GOSH, its the first time I hate a british actor but he's sooo not the bond style. it's me or the actresses isn't that good eather ?
2006-12-11 23:18:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Banana Happy 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I thought "Casino Royale" was a great movie but I can see why you may not have liked it. "Casino Royale" was the first James Bond novel that was written. So, this movie is essentially reinventing the James Bond franchise by starting out at the beginning. In the novel and in the movie, we're introduced to a Bond who has just earned his Double 0 status, and is not yet the smooth operator that we are familiar with from the other movies. He's still clumsy and makes mistakes. And we also get a better sense of why James has such fleeting relationships with women, as a result of Vesper's betrayal. James was falling in love with Vesper and then following her betrayal, James becomes a different man (i.e. the Bond audiences are more familiar with) Hope that makes sense.
2006-12-12 08:22:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by ralphwaldo45 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
You're entitled to your opinion, of course...but you're wrong.
Daniel Craig is undoubtedly the best actor since Connery to play the role, and his Bond has one essential advantage that all of the intervening Bonds didn't have...he's BELIEVABLE. He sweats, he gets beaten up, he gets angry, he LOSES from time to time. But the dude is an absolute juggernaut. He just keeps moving forward, and he eventually bulls his way to the outcome he desires.
Long live the new Bond!
2006-12-12 09:31:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by shkspr 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Anyone that pays $15 to see a movie is a bit slow, so James Bond got your money, you could have waited and watched it on HBO in a month. Either way, you pay.
Of course James Bond is garbage, the Writer is dead, so its hacks that are trying to copy what was and still is an original ideal.
2006-12-12 07:16:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yeah, the new bond should've been Julian McMahon. But Daniel Craig did a pretty good job with it.
2006-12-12 07:07:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Greg S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are you talking about? I don't even like Bond movies, and even i thought it was good. And the reason i went to see it was because a few friends had suggested it, saying it was good. I guess people just have different tastes in films.
2006-12-12 08:13:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Skippy 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
First of all Daniel Craig is gorgeous!! And he is english.James Bond is an english Secret service Agent. The film is called Casino Royale. CASINO,Know wot I mean.!! I think Maybe the film was too far over your head!!
2006-12-12 08:04:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
That was a good one, he is one of the worst BOND ever. He lacks elegance,style, looks and what not. He can only be a side kick in the movies and can not be looked upon like Bond which has a class to maintain.
Acc to me that was a pure Flop Show.
2006-12-12 07:19:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by AlfaRomeo 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
LMAO.........i completely agree..........finally someone has the same opinion........AND YOURE A GIRL!!!........youre awesome....
you hit it dead on.........the Ford.......the endless poker............and the Rocky reference was hilarious.........
yep people watch the stupidest stuff these days.......
im a guy, so i really wouldnt know, but i think hes the least handsome of all Bond actors..........
2006-12-12 08:23:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by SpinKick 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
thank you thank you thank you!!! i told my husband that the other night. we saw casino royal. it was okay, btu he doesn;t fit the bond type. usually in a bond film you have a cute, handsome wll cut man for the ladies to drool over and for the fellas you have a pretty, hot bod actress. i was so disappointed. he is ugly.
2006-12-12 07:07:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋