an excuse for the largest gay population to come together under the pretence of male bonding - is that why they dont encourage women in the sport!
2006-12-11 22:33:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
LOL thats what I have been saying all along...
2006-12-11 22:35:29 · answer #1 · answered by erinboberin21 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, that's not why women do not play football.
It's because the best male athletes are one heck of a lot bigger, stronger, and faster than the best female athletes.
In fact, the best female athletes are not as strong, big, or fast as mediocre male athletes.
That's why Martina Navratilova, when she was in the prime of her career, couldn't even beat her own coach. Because her coach was a man. And her coach wasn't even an active pro player.
Actually, I'm sure you could find some women out there playing football, if you looked hard enough. But I want to see the BEST players play -- and the best football players are guys.
.
2006-12-11 22:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have often thought that football was a way for closeted and self hating homosexuals to have an excuse for wearing tight clothing and bending over and jumping on top of other guys all the while holding a ball as their main instrument of play and patting another guy on the butt when the ball gets a score.But I think that perhaps I was reading to much into the homoerotic acts of football.But then again...
2006-12-11 22:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by BuckFush 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here's an idea why don't you go to a game and ask as many people as you can? Maybe use the public announcement system.
I suspect you would have the answer pretty quick.
Also I assume you are taking about Football as in Association Rules (DON'T EVER CALL IT SOCCER), and not American Football (where feet and ball rarely come into contact, which is an off shoot of Rugby League).
Its a void question really, would you say shoe shopping is for closet lesbians? Thought not.
2006-12-11 22:43:55 · answer #4 · answered by Finlay S 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely! Bring on the male bonding!
2006-12-11 22:46:31 · answer #5 · answered by Fraser 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I asked a similar sort of question last night and the insults were flying at me til 4 this morning. So, I think you're right.
They need somewhere to bond I guess.
2006-12-11 22:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Missing Link 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hy hons gay boyfriends daviie and steviie hons, gay porno stars and nude waiters gay mens bar restaurants and male stripers hons, and we thought for a second you were talking about professional contact sports like wrestling and foootbal hons. yes hons we need our male bonding in the sports hons, especialy if your secretly gay and into professional soprts hons, like owe checking out the hot hung cute guys strip naked in locker rooms hons yumy time! if you invitedd the lite ladies in hons we, who are gay couldent stand around and check out the hot hung guys in lockerr roms hons we would lose it hons really fast if were secretly gay hons, and who wants to see saggy old hoters in mens lockerr rooms hons?? and yes we have the largest presence hons your right!!
2006-12-12 00:02:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no they won't let women play football because they think we'll get seriously hurt and that the pads are way too heavy. But there is poder puff football.
2006-12-11 22:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
interesting idea..... - i would put it anotherway, the male bonding shown on the media has help acceptance of being gay in the modern world
2006-12-11 22:35:47 · answer #9 · answered by matty01253 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seeing the amount of homophobia within the sport, I doubt it.
2006-12-12 04:22:15 · answer #10 · answered by Adam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no,no!
It's a straight game is football.
It's Rugby that's gay, 'cos they play it in public schools and theological colleges.
I mean, what other all-male game has a load of boys dressed in shorts, throwing their arms around each other and bending over?
They're just scrum-boys.
2006-12-11 22:53:04 · answer #11 · answered by musonic 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋