English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-11 20:15:20 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Personally I think we'll meet our demise quicker at the hands of the Jews opposed to the arabs. Look what happened to Jesus...

2006-12-11 20:29:42 · update #1

The arabs we can handle with bullets and bombs, but the Jews are intertwined with our money...WTF!

2006-12-11 20:31:15 · update #2

18 answers

Are you really Jimmy Earl Carter pretending to be someone else?

2006-12-11 23:00:38 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 2 0

The jewish culture and belief system is based on their religion and the power that lies within israel's historical perspective, as does the arab nation. Yet, the jewish nation has immigrated to eastern european countries and then after ww2 uselessness, israel became a recognized country again for all jews to return and live in. With the arab nations there was a very different relationship established, oil. History has documented the stupid sense of hatred these two nations feel towards each other, thus creating territorial problems, cultural differences and definitely different religious beliefs and the language is opposite to one another, funny their neighbours. Each nation wants to be the better one of the two, the best. Well searching for the best, has resulted in nuclear threats which both these nations possess. Which jew or arab can kill or nuke more human beings is the question need to be adressed. There soon won't be any arabs, jews or humans left to kill.

2006-12-11 21:18:29 · answer #2 · answered by Lesha a Canadian. 3 · 0 0

Jews control a very significant percentage of America's economy. Not much that is important in America can be done without the consent or involvement of Jews directly or indirectly. Most Arabs are muslims and are considered backward, fanatical and cannot be trusted, not even with a pop gun. Further more, if Arabs go nuclear, it may become impossible to pump their oil, at least not as cheaply. Another simple reason is that if a country is considered friendly and stands alongside America on major political or economic issues, it is okay for it to go nuclear - other classic eamples: Pakistan and India. Of those which America thinks unreliable eg Iran, they would be a huge threat if they even try to develop nuclear energy.

2006-12-12 01:40:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The general consensus is that Israel shouldn't have become a nuclear power, and the official policy is neither to confirm nor deny that they have nukes, though there's a good deal of evidence that they do. If so, it's a fait accompli, and that ends the discussion of that part.
In addition to the overall impetus to nuclear proliferation, it must be noted that though Israel has been very aggressively defensive, several other mid-east countries have shown a propensity to first strikes, not to mention their supplying arms to terrorists. Israel, by contrast, if she's had nukes all these years, has shown a capacity for restraint in not using them.

2006-12-11 22:03:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No to Jews but okey for Arabs.

The media always made Israel as prey eventhough Israel always make pre-emptive strike to Lebanon and Palestine everyday.

Killing one Isreali is equally 1,000 custody of Arabs in Palestineans. That the justification by USA government. Ask John Bolton, former USA Rep. in UN.

2006-12-11 20:54:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It doesn't make sense does it? We have no right to regulate others advancement in respect to technology. Nukes are bad for the surrival of mankind, but we already have them, everyone knows if they fire off one some one will fire one back. There is also peaceful usage of the same technology, called energy, and again we hvae no right as we are not the worlds cop nor ruler to tell others how to develope

2006-12-11 22:31:49 · answer #6 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0 1

Please name all the Jewish terror groups that have set off bombs in Europe or America. Do you think if all the Arab countries have nukes that the Islamic Militants won't get one from them? Do you think they would use it? That may be the biggest difference.

2006-12-11 21:11:13 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 0 0

Because the Jews won't threaten other nations with it, unlike the Arabs who just want to kick off their Apocalypse. Of course, Israel is known for preemptive strikes on military targets. Hummm.

2006-12-11 20:42:53 · answer #8 · answered by bigbro3006 3 · 0 2

It will not do any good to answer you I can see that. But the reason is that Israel only has defensive objectives. They do not openly espouse wiping nations off the face of the earth, jihad or spreading their brand of Islam globally

2006-12-11 21:43:35 · answer #9 · answered by beckychr007 6 · 0 0

Mmmmm!!!
Maybe cause jews r the most "angelic" ppl on earth!!!
Maybe cause jews never attacked anybody in Lebanon or Palastine or Egypt or Syria or Jordan!!!
Maybe cause jews never occupied other ppls land in 1967 like Egypt(Sinai) or Syria(Golan heights) or Lebanon(Shaba farms) or Palastine(Gaza,West bank)and still occuping them till today except for Sinai & Gaza!!!
Maybe cause jews never comited MASSACRES against the Arabs in Lebanon ,Egypt & Palastine,and all the Massacres and KIDS kilings that was comited by them was only by MISTAKE!!!
So as u see all these reasons just show that jews r the most PEACFULL ppl on earth!!!,and thats why they ONLY can have nuks,but Arabs cant.

2006-12-11 20:49:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers