Can someone who knows about telescopes look at this & give me their advice. This looks like a great telescope (5.1) goto for $159!?
It is a Meade, which is a good brand. Is it possible they made a cheapo version?? I mean if it's 5.1 and it's a Meade doesn't it mean it's a very good telescope? It does have a scratch or dent... do you think it is that that drove the price way down?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=015&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=250058006838&rd=1&rd=1
It's not that "impressive" looking or pretty, however, it is a lot cheaper than the Starseeker I was going to pluck down $389 for the same 'stats' but is a bit "prettier".
Here's the StarSeeker... both are 130mm goto's, big difference in price... am I missing something? Maybe cuz it's discontinued?
https://www.oriontel.com/jump.jsp?itemID=256410&itemType=PRODUCT
Racking my brain here... I'm not sure my son is going to take this thing outside more than 4x a year.
2006-12-11
16:40:29
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Genie♥Angel
5
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
or........ this one???
Also appears to be a Meade 130. One person mentioned these were sold at Walmart?! But if it's Meade doesn't that say enough about the quality?
http://cgi.ebay.com/MEADE-130mm-5-1-8-FULLY-AUTOMATIC-ASTR-TELESCOPE_W0QQitemZ290060243533QQihZ019QQcategoryZ28181QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
2006-12-11
16:44:06 ·
update #1
Can someone explain the difference of focal length? I thought less was better?
2006-12-11
17:09:04 ·
update #2
One downside to the Meade-- it is alot heavier -- 27 lbs vs only 13 lbs for the Orion.
2006-12-11
17:21:12 ·
update #3