To live for someone.
Because that would be devoting an awful lot of tears, sweat & years in the bargain.
2006-12-11 16:51:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe they're both equally important. It takes a rare kind of person who is willing to do both to the fullest extent though :)
2006-12-12 00:36:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
to live for someone...more chances of being happy
2006-12-12 00:38:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥♥♥H뮧hË¥™♥♥♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
if i live for you i die for you as i only want you happy
2006-12-12 00:34:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by erica 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
To live for somone and CONTINUE to make an impact on their lives
2006-12-12 00:35:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
to die for someone....because that is ETERNAL. you can't come back or change your mind.
"there is no greater love than to lay down one's life for a friend".
---words of christ
2006-12-12 00:34:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
TO DIE FOR SOEONE IS MORE IMPORTANT, BECAUSE IF YOU SPEND YOUR WHOLE LIFE LIVING FOR OTHER, THEN YOU WON'T LIVE FOR YOURSELF, AND THAT'S NOT LIVING.
2006-12-12 03:54:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To live for someone. If you have the control, you have the control.(redundant , I know) If they have the control, than you don't. It is all about control.
2006-12-12 00:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Professor Sheed 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
live. lls
2006-12-12 05:43:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by charles d 6
·
0⤊
0⤋