another war if we pull out? Isn't that why Bush and his goons are in denial to pull out because of the ultimate embarrassment that we were wrong to invade Iraq and now we're going home with tails between our legs? So if we pull out doesn't that make us like idiots that we made a mess and let someone else fix the mess?
2006-12-11 15:42:53 · 16 answers · asked by Believe me 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Also, Bush doesn't want to pull out while his in the office so it does't have to go on his record as another loser president of the United States.
2006-12-11 15:51:45 · update #1
To Pig Poop: Are you kidding? His dad is the who started this war with Iraq and made enemy with Saddam unnecessarily. Sr. Bush could've prevented Saddam from invading Kuwait if he hadn't turned blind-eye to Saddam before the Kuwait invasion. Sr. Bush was eager to go to war so there's some conspiracy we don't know about. But Sr. Bush is just as evil if not more.
2006-12-11 15:56:55 · update #2
Totally agree with you....I think that we're in a terrible situation and Bush is insisting on staying in a place where more people are going to get killed and we have no chance of winning...whatever the definition of "winning" is. It's horrible that we're there....the current administration is terrible.
2006-12-11 20:04:51 · answer #1 · answered by kristina807 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know what I didn't agree with the war. And now we are there we fighting what has become a religious war something that last for year and year and year.
The problem here is if we leave now. Iran will most likely come in and take over. This would only be a negative because much of the world will start perceiving them as a world power. They accomplished what American could not. They have nuclear capabilities etc.
President Bush is left with a dang if I do dang if I don't. That's why he needs these committees to try and find the best solution. Without leaving Iran open to take over.
2006-12-11 20:39:07 · answer #2 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sir, we can win this war, we somewhat have. The issues are of terrorists who do not want Iraq to succeed. Many of these come from Syria, Iran and Lebanon. We are trying to give the Iraqi proplr a little power at a time, instead of a BOOM-here you go now type of thing. Democracies are a little harder to create than dictatorships, so it is taking time. This is not a drivethru situation, taking only a couple of minutes and everyone being friendly. You must be patient. It will be a success, but not necessarily right this minute. I do agree the management could have been far more efficient.
2006-12-11 16:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who else would "clean up the mess" Seriously, I think mistakes have been made and will be made and it was irresponsible for the US to leave Iraq and let the middle east cycle into even greater chaos. So sure say what you want about the stupidity of the current administration I may agree. But leaving will only make a bad situation worse. so go for you become president and just give it up thats cool. I mean no pressure, you aren't being judged by the whole world.
Its a lose lose situation and i would rather lose slowly and try to help people but whatever, we can let another country cycle into governmentless anarchy cause that always good for people and the world.
2006-12-11 15:56:51 · answer #4 · answered by rockfishogre 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
we are in no way going to leave Iraq. keep in concepts Peolosi first 100hrs even with take position with that. "we can impeach bush" in no way heard a element after the dems took administration of the senate. i somewhat believe the dems believes in Bush in the back of closed doorways they purely can't believe him contained in the open because they comprehend they'd in no way get re-elected The media will cover the warfare otherwise how large progression is occurring when you consider that there's a dem in place of work. yet in reality is its an same element occurring on the instantaneous. particularly of displaying a nasty area of Iraq and the warfare they'll educate an excellent area of Iraq. they'll make you've self belief that Hillary or Obama did all of this.
2016-11-25 22:06:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is still puzzling to me and John McCain repeatedly questions is WTH pres Bush has not sent in troops while our champions are in dire straits. Alot of the big wigs have agreed and people have admitted there's a shortage of everything-it's almost like our troops are sacrifices. Also the UN is becoming very Socialist and is planning on taking over the Internet, seas, more land, & whatever.
2006-12-11 16:35:15 · answer #6 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ask yourself which family has extensive interests in the oil companies now controlling iraq's oil.
2006-12-12 10:43:02 · answer #7 · answered by casino man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a cowardly loser that never measured up to his father's acheivements. He has the "little man" syndrome.
I'm not talking about George I, and his political career. It's the personal life I was referring to. Perhaps you should take a class in elementary psychology partner. It never ceases to amaze me that so many like yourself, don't know what is really going on here. It is amateurs like you that give us liberals a bad name.
2006-12-11 15:47:54 · answer #8 · answered by Proud Liberal 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
He has his own personal agenda, he is determined to have things go his way (and he does not care by what means he gets it) and he does not want to look weak by caving in to others.
I think we should impeach the schmuck and let someone competent take over - but I have thought that since his first year in office.
Peace!
2006-12-11 15:46:41 · answer #9 · answered by carole 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Will it is simple they the goons will not make money like shoot um up dick an no bid bush
2006-12-11 15:48:11 · answer #10 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋