English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Use Cylindrical Shell method to find the volume of the solid generated when the region enclosed by the given curves is revolved about the y-axis.

y=x^3, x=1, y=0

2006-12-11 15:24:24 · 3 answers · asked by daniel_hower 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

please interns of dy

2006-12-11 15:32:19 · update #1

3 answers

i hate these but no one else is doing it so i will answer.

2*pi*integral (x*x^3 dx) from [0,1]

2*pi [(x^5)/5] from [0,1]

and we get 2*pi

2006-12-11 15:51:02 · answer #1 · answered by xian gaon 2 · 0 0

The cylindrical shell method involves approximating the volume under the surface of revolution by a series of concentric cylindrical shells, where the height of a particular shell between the values x1 and x1 + d is f(x1) and thus the volume contained by the shell is Pi*((x1 + d)^2)*f(x1) - Pi*((x1)^2)*f(x1 + d) = Pi*f(x1)*[(x1 + d)^2 - (x1)^2] = Pi*f(x1)*(x1 + d - x1)(x1 + d + x1) = Pi*f(x1)*(2x1 + d)*d. We uniformly slice the region over (x1, x2) into n cylindrical shells such that each shell has d = (x2 - x1)/n and sum these cylindrical slices over the interval (x1, x2), then take the limit as n increases without bound (or likewise, as d approaches 0) to get the integral form 2*Pi*Int[x1, x2][x*f(x)] dx.
In your case, we get the form 2*Pi*Int[0, 1][x^4] dx.Note the similarity to the formula C = 2*Pi*r, as if we were summing infinitesimally thin cylindrical shells of height f(x) and radius x.
There is no dy in the cylindrical shell method for this curve; you would use dy if you were using the disc method. In that case, you would rewrite the function as f(y) = y^(1/3) and use the integral form Pi*Int[0, 1][(y^(1/3))^2] dy, as if we were summing infinitesimally thin cylinders of radius f(y) and height dy.

2006-12-11 15:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by Ron 6 · 0 0

before each and every thing; why do you want to sparkling up this in dy, at the same time as it truly is way a lot less annoying to sparkling up for dx? it truly is between the benefits of cylindrical shells; they're many times more effective for rotating around the y-axis bear in mind that the quantity is solved utilizing good the following formula. y=x^3, x = a million, y = 0 First, we state our go section. A(x) = 2pi(r)(h) = 2pi(x)(y) rationalization: we are attempting to sparkling up for the go section, when you consider that V = fundamental (A(x) dx) The go section is measured by the circumference of between the shells circumstances the top. x represents the radius, and y represents the top. even with the undeniable fact that, y = x^3, so A(x) = 2pi(x)(x^3) So our fundamental will change into fundamental (2pi(x)(x^3)dx OR, pulling out the consistent, 2pi * fundamental (x(x^3))dx 2pi * fundamental (x^4) dx What are our bounds of integration? For one element, we are fixing this problem contained in the x-route (our shells are stacked from left to good). the first certain will easily be the y-axis, 0. the 2d certain is x = a million. hence, we stumble on the fundamental from 0 to at least a million. 2pi * fundamental (0 to at least a million, x^4) dx which supplies us 2pi * [ (x^5)/5, evaluated from 0 to at least a million ] 2pi * [a million/5] 2pi/5

2016-11-25 22:04:30 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers