I was reading about emerging properties (System's Theory)...?

Question

And how they helped reinforce the validity of studies such as the phenomenom of concience. Before, it was considered that it was not valid because conscience is just a complex disposition of matter (brain), so it was enough with studying matter.

The question is, who "put" those emerging events on the way, or was it just a matter of luck?

Answer 1

Who? If you have two people arguing the source of human action, one of them argues the Good, the other argues the need of the moment: Out of this difference of these two, what concepts are posited and negated, which are rationalist and which empirical. Which one do you trust. The development, growth or birth for philosophy grows up from questions and opposition to difference. You have ego for certainty and certification and anti ego for doubt and question.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/sl/slsyllog.htm#SL192n

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phc2cc.htm

"The Phenomenology of Mind

C: Free Concrete Mind: (BB) Spirit

C: Morality
c. Conscience: The “Beautiful Soul”:
Evil and the Forgiveness of it
Φ 632. The antinomy in the moral view of the world — viz. that there is a moral consciousness and that there is none, or that the validity, the bindingness of duty has its ground beyond consciousness, and conversely only takes effect in consciousness — these contradictory elements had been combined in the idea, in which the non-moral consciousness is to pass for moral, its contingent knowledge and will to be accepted as fully sufficing, and happiness to be its lot as a matter of grace. Moral self consciousness took this self-contradictory idea not upon itself, but transferred it to another being. But this putting outside itself of what it must think as necessary is as much a contradiction in form as the other was in content. "

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phc2cc.htm