i had a blood test done in 1989 and it came back as 72%, would that make me the father? also the mother according to moms pregantcy she carried the baby 11 months but yet i had to pay child support for 18 years and saved all my receipts that she wasn't aware of and now the mother of the child in question says i am behind 20.000 , when she had me locked up i had to pay up to date before i could get out of jail so how does the laws let mothers that lie in court under path get away with putting us men through all this crap?
2006-12-11 12:55:56 · 7 answers · asked by charlse c 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
72% only means that you could not be excluded as the father (but it also means that you were not definitively identified as being the father) DNA testing has come a LONNNNNNNNG way since back then. I'd advise you to ask for a new test, and also I'd be asking my lawyer why, if I had all my receipts proving I had paid the child support, could I be convicted of being a dead-beat dad. and there's the 11 month pregnancy - no doctor would ever let a woman go that long without inducing labor. It would be dangerous to both the mother AND the baby. Methinks you got skewered in more ways than one (by the way, I'm a woman, but I still think something's rotten in Denmark in your case)
2006-12-11 13:08:30 · answer #1 · answered by nana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, now that we are in the year 2000, you know DNA is more accurate, so if I was you, I'd go get a test done, take that biitch to court of she refuses for all the shiiit she put you through. There's a game-and a sleezy one women play, and it works most of the time because the men are so stupid-called the daddy hunt, where they will fcuk so many men, and when they find out their pregnant go to the best economically stabled partner they fcuked, and tell them that the child is their's, when in reality, it could be another man's-they just do this so the man can suport the bastard, so they won't have to worry too much. Slluts!
2006-12-11 21:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dna tests are suppost to be like 99.9% when a baby belongs to someone. I have never ever heard it to be 72%.
I would say you are not the father, get a new dna test done. But if you have been around this kid for that long and you are the only dad he knows then i wouldn't worry
2006-12-11 21:11:26 · answer #3 · answered by ஐ♥Julian'sMommy♥ஐ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't think it is possible to carry 11 months, I would get a new paternity test, they probably weren't as good as they are now. Also if you have receipts then you should be fine, I don't know how she got away with it.
2006-12-11 21:01:24 · answer #4 · answered by The Invisible Woman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
get a blood test done now. DNA testing was in it's infancy back in the 80's. if you saved all your receipts, why didn't you bring them with you to show the court that you had paid? something doesn't sounds right here.
2006-12-11 20:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by redpeach_mi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At 72% sounds like you have some DNA mathcing, but not enought to call you the father. Howeever, with that many matching alleles, it sounds like it could be one of your family members.
2006-12-11 20:59:34 · answer #6 · answered by stefani_m2003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you're not the dad. I had a DNA test done on my son and it was 99.99 per cent positive it was me.
Don't be a victim.
2006-12-11 21:06:05 · answer #7 · answered by Thurston Howell III 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋