If he doesn't have the cojones to face O'Reilly, how's he going to do against the Arabs?
2006-12-11 13:11:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
nicely i'm an somewhat emotional maximum cancers and that i visit no longer help it. so as that they were provided that area good... so what? yet i'm no longer clingy and that i do not rely on others for each little element... i do not choose human beings round 24/7 and that i detect it somewhat draining. i'm ok being with myself, studying a e book at the same time as eating Ben and Jerry's ice cream. it truly is totally stressful with virtually each and every e book describe us as moody whiners, somewhat reliable and all that different crap. The nicest element they say about us is being 'motherly' and 'being concerned' at the same time as different zodiac sings has something so beautiful about them. on the outdoors, if i do not comprehend you, I come for the era of unemotional and seem distant...oops that sounds like a particular air signal, does it? i do not imagine that well-known astrology books will ever replace the outline of Cancerians any more effective quickly. I comprehend that human beings do have similar features in themselves like their solar signal and that i comprehend some those which have some useless ringers (I already aspect out with myself). yet like you reported, there is more effective than the final horoscope labels they position upon us. I somewhat have a Sag Moon and does no longer concepts listening to the reality if it helps me contained in the destiny even with the actual incontrovertible reality that it's going to harm to hearken to it (maximum cancers emotions lower back) and a Capricorn ascendant that makes me unreadable and distant to those i'm no longer on the point of to. we are the underrated underdogs and we are some distance from weak. we are those that maximum folk will run to or keep issues at the same time at the same time as all and dissimilar else falling aside.
2016-11-25 21:45:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ayoub 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because O'Reilly is not a news worthy show to go on. There is absolutly no journalism on that show. It is more a show of yelling matches between O'Reilly and every guest he has. Also I love the Barrack Hussein Obama/Osama. Wonder if the person posting this question understands that no other canidate running or thinking of running for president is not having there middle name used in an attempt to scare the American voter. Very dissappointed in America today.
2006-12-11 12:53:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tim C 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
Since when are the 2 the same person?
2006-12-11 12:48:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by probablestars 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Barak Obama is waiting for the right moment. It's all about timing and how much exposure you can get. And, maybe he's getting coached on how to deal with O'Reilly.
2006-12-11 12:54:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ceci 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe he would ask the tough questions and he could not or would not want to answer to jeopardize his presidential run.
I am a little scared on this one, he came up awfully quick and has alot of super wealthy people supporting him.
2006-12-11 12:55:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by schell_75 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because O'Reilly is a lying scumbag who would video edit the interview to make him look bad like he always does to his guess. And by the typing of Barrack Obama you are clearly a bias racist Faux News watcher.
2006-12-11 12:50:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
A better question is "Why would he WANT to go on a tight-@$$ show like O'Reily's". I don't think it is fear, but intelligence.
I think the fact that Bill O'Reily is on it makes it something to stay away from. He is a tight-@$$ed idiot. And I try not to pass judgement, but he really says some stupid things. . .
And if your vote is based on what shows a person is on, I really think that no one would want your vote anyways. . .
2006-12-11 12:56:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Because he only goes on shows where people will fawn over him.
2006-12-11 12:48:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Because you and Oreily are IDIOTS.............
2006-12-11 14:38:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ali M 4
·
1⤊
1⤋