English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHich Graphics are technicly better?
And which look better?

2006-12-11 12:12:35 · 8 answers · asked by imakegirlzgoloco 2 in Consumer Electronics Games & Gear

8 answers

hey man check this link out http://www.gamespot.com/features/6162742/index.html?sid=6162742&click=topslot
they show you a comparison between the ps3 graphics and the xbox360.

TAKE THIS IN CONSIDERATION!!!
the ps3 just came out and developers havent gottend a chance to use the ps3 full potential!
this games are 2nd generation for the xbox 360 and 1st generation for ps3.

if you want reall results, you will have to wait at least a year, when the developers know how to use the console's full potential.

2006-12-11 12:19:14 · answer #1 · answered by A0Dki11z 2 · 0 1

Ha, I just love the ps3 fanboys out there- they have no clue that they are using arguments that were used in the last console battle- and we all know how that really turned out.

Here is the bottom line. The graphics difference between the two systems is negligible. For those of you that don't understand what that means- there is very little difference. Both Microsoft and Sony did an excellent job with the hardware on both of these machines- and they both go about doing it in different ways. With that said, most people will probably tell you that Sony might have a little more power than the Microsoft box, but it won't matter. You really will never see this difference in any game that comes out for both systems. As we all know from the previous battle- the lowest common denominator wins out. Most games will be developed for both systems- and they will both look pretty much the same. Add to this the sheer fact that more exclusive titles will go on the Xbox 360 than the ps3 and I have to ask everyone why they really want to wait for Sony to get their act together.

Add to this and then think about the online element- which Microsoft is totally nailing right now, and Sony is once again stumbling with- and it's pretty clear that Sony is in deep doo-doo. I just hope some other large tech company decides to get in the video game thing to create some competition for Microsoft once Sony has bitten it- or we'll all suffer as consumers. Then again, I've suffered enough with Sony's complete disregard for reliability- and their desire for proprietary formats.

2006-12-12 05:15:06 · answer #2 · answered by BackCylinder 2 · 0 0

There both pretty much the same, if anything, I feel that the Xbox 360's graphics are slightly better than the PS3. Take a look at this link to compare the graphics. This should help you make your decision between the two.
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6162742/index.html
Make sure you click (next) under the last picture to see more examples.
I hope this helped.

2006-12-11 12:18:28 · answer #3 · answered by Tom 3 · 0 0

that is a good, and controversial question, although, that is shown that the ps3 has more advantageous suited snap shots. an elementary thanks to guage, even without taking section in both, only look at their stats, video games like halo and gears bypass rather on the point of the finished power of the 360, it has elementary limits. for the ps3, as of now, in elementary words the inventor of the cel processor and blu ray is established with this is limits, all all of us comprehend is that we arent even close, those self same video games on the 360 ought to in elementary words be at maximum 30% of the ps3's power and features. in short the ps3 is able, and has already damaged a minimum of four situations the snap shots and features of the 360. if halo were to be on ps3, it ought to have more advantageous suited snap shots besides as larger determination, and larger gameplay and motions. the ps3 alongside with the blu ray is what enables it to surpass the 360. even without the blu ray, the cel processor on my own can make this is capabiities 4(x) (x is the variable for the different untapped cores of the ps3, with those cores unlocked, it ought to surpass 12 situations the 360 somewhat. in case you opt for to ensure more advantageous about the bu ray and processor, look it up on you tube or wikipedia. this can answer your question, the ps3 is all round more advantageous suited than the 360 in snap shots and ability, i am going to assert this entirely without bias or exaggeration. I have both ps3 and 360, they're both good, that is in elementary words elementary understanding that the ps3 is more advantageous suited. absolutely everyone who says otherwise is a fanboy who comprehend's im accurate yet is lost in denile. wish this enables.

2016-11-30 11:13:43 · answer #4 · answered by kuebler 4 · 0 0

Right now probably 360 BUT I think later on the Ps3s graphics will be better because of the blu-ray and its like a high power computer. Did you ever see the first games of the PS2? they're a lot better now.

2006-12-11 12:17:06 · answer #5 · answered by Tim A 2 · 0 2

PS3.
PS3 graphics run at higher speeds(i forget what) and it has about six processors.

2006-12-11 12:17:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

PS3

2006-12-11 12:17:02 · answer #7 · answered by minidude 5 · 0 0

check this out.

http://www.playb3yond.com

2006-12-11 12:30:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers