English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-11 11:47:38 · 9 answers · asked by hi :) 2 in Computers & Internet Hardware Laptops & Notebooks

9 answers

Celeron is the low-end (and low cost) member of the family of microprocessors from Intel that is based on its P6 architecture. Although it is based on the same architecture as the Pentium II, it lacks some high-performance features of the Pentium II line. Celeron models later than the 300 A include an L1 and L2 cache on the microchip, meaning that the cache is accessed at the same clock speed that the processor operates with. The Celeron L2 cache is smaller (128 kilobytes) than the Pentium II's (512 KB). However, because the Celeron L2 cache is on the processor chip and the Pentium II's is not, their effective L2 speeds are closely comparable. With clock speeds up to 466 MHz, Celeron processors are attractive to power users at first glance, but they should be compared to the Pentium II's computing power in order to get an idea of their useful application.

2006-12-11 12:40:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A Celeron will artwork presented you have have been given a working laptop or computing gadget with a USB port. The assertion that it demands a Pentium II or greater beneficial would not make any experience besides (that's no longer a bite of utility that demands a valuable computing gadget yet a bite of hardware that any modern-day OS will cope with on exceptionally lots something it may run on). As for the cost of the Celerons, the 1st ones (at 266 MHz and 3 hundred MHz with none L2 cache) have been hideously sluggish yet while Intel further some L2 cache to them they grew to alter into such as a similrly clock Pentium II (Celerons with L2 cache have been 3 hundred MHz and up, the 300s with cache have been frequently particular 300A to tell apart them from those with none). As Intel moved to the Pentium III and Pentium 4 the Celeron line substitute into as much as date to function various the advancements (the unique Celerons have been based on the Pentium II and have been to replace the Pentium MMX as Intel's low end processor) so a modern-day Celeron is going to be much greater valuable than a Pentium II (the Celerons have been Intel's value variety kind processor so they frequently did no longer have as lots cache because of the fact the costlier stuff and additionally weren't generally clock as extreme at any given time).

2016-12-18 11:42:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Newer Celeron is fast than the Pentium II... But the Newer Pentium four smokes a Celeron

2006-12-11 11:49:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The answer is the Celeron.

The latest Celerons added 128 kb of L2 cache to run at full speed. Compared to the Pentium II's at half speed (but double the amount), the Celerons run applications faster on the same machine.

For more info, check this out:

http://www.cpuscorecard.com/cpufaqs/sep99c.htm

2006-12-11 11:57:33 · answer #4 · answered by dm_dragons 5 · 1 0

Celeron

2006-12-11 11:50:16 · answer #5 · answered by cando4u2006 1 · 0 0

Depends on the clock speed, the data being worked on, the other hardware. A 3Ghz Celeron will be faster than a PII-300. You need more information in your question.

2006-12-11 11:49:29 · answer #6 · answered by traciatim 3 · 1 0

pentium 2

2006-12-11 11:55:25 · answer #7 · answered by Jason L 3 · 0 0

Don't bother with either one. You can get a P4 or fast AMD that will run circles around both of those, for nothing these days.

2006-12-11 11:55:08 · answer #8 · answered by poorcocoboiboi 6 · 0 0

OF THE TWO YOU HAVE LISTED, PENTIUM II


GOD BLESS

2006-12-11 11:50:47 · answer #9 · answered by thewindowman 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers