over from scratch? No more: terrorists, insurgents, civil war, radical Iraqi Shia clerics, threat of Iran taking over Iraq, US casulities, or worries about who's leading the Iraqi Govt. Oil will survive nuclear blasts, Iran would stop it's nuclear program ASAP (kill two birds w/ one stone). If anyone has a better solution that will solve ALL the problems in Iraq in 30 minutes or less I'd love to hear them.
2006-12-11 11:43:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If the US stays in Iraq for the next 25 years hundreds of thousands of people will die including US troops. If the US leaves Iraq there will be a massive civil war that would kill millions. Strategically targeted nuclear weapons in Iraq would kill tens of thousands but will solve every problem the US has in Iraq in 30 minutes. Which of those options would you pick and you have to pick one of them because there aren't any other options for solving the Iraq mess.
2006-12-11 13:41:04 · update #1
#1 on my list
2006-12-11 11:45:28 · answer #1 · answered by whosajiggawhat? 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A lack of good ideas doesnt justify the use of a bad idea.
If youre starving in an isolated room and theres no food to be found, it doesnt mean eating the carpet is a good way to go.
Bush wouldnt even think of it, heres why.
We are not the big bad dogs on the block anymore. China has us by the balls in debt, and they have the manpower and militia to make sure we dont weasle out of it.
Lets face it, Bush sold this country to china, among a few other countries, or should we now call them "stockholders"?
If we decided to make such a vulgar display of power, I'm pretty sure it would be the last straw for at least a dozen or so countries who havent been that fond of us for the past few decades, and they'll be more happy to bring WW3 to our doorstep to make sure theyre not next.
Want my solution?
Get some diplomats in office. You country boys sure like your big, well.......anything that makes a loud fugging noise and causes lots of destruction, but I dont think it's really too hard to understand the idea of social manipulation.
Ever got suckered into buying a car you didnt want?
Imagine using that sort of concept when it comes to foreign relations. Diplomacy isnt some liberal wussy fag idea. It's just the damned smart way of doing things.
Then people dont want to kill, you, and hell, they'll even trade resources with you.
Next time you go to your local store, think about this:
You can just kill the guy behind the counter, and you'd get a lot of free stuff. But if you want that stuff to keep coming in, your going to have to place all the orders and handle all the freight yourself.
Or you calm the hell down,, pay him him a reasonable fee, and be on your way.
But I guess thats just too easy. Gotta be fighting something to feel like a patriot eh?
2006-12-11 12:04:53 · answer #2 · answered by NecroPsyChroNauTron 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
its exactly why countries like iran want nuclear arms - so they will not be attacked by america. If you think its a good idea to kill millions of people and contaminate half the planet with radioactivity then you are even dumber than bush.
didnt you learn any lesson from 9/11????
They dont hate you because you are american- they hate you because you destroy people's lives without a second thought
2006-12-11 11:58:06 · answer #3 · answered by adam_adams_25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even bush is not that stupid to start using nukes T%he solution is real simple Let Iraq run its own affairs and have the u,s, keep its big nose out of it. The Arab countries have always fought amongst themselves and will continue to do so. We need to get back to rounding up Ossama Bin Laden and his followers instead of going into countries that are not bothering ours and starting a war with them. The bottom line is The U.S. needs to mind its own business and stop worrying about how other countries manage theirs
2006-12-11 11:55:19 · answer #4 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably not very high, although If any President would not hesitate to use a nucleur weopon I believe it would be this one. He does have a plan to use nucleur bunker busters in the future.
He is content to see our brave soldiers suffer and die with no end and no solution in sight. For 3 &1/2 years he has refused to accept criticism or listen to advice. Only his sagging poll numbers and the unpopularity of the war are forcing him to finally listen to other opinions.
21% approve of Bush's handling of Iraq.
75% disapprove
2006-12-11 11:51:55 · answer #5 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He's dropped untold nuclear smart bombs already. The Iraqi population is glowing -- and people say that stuff is in the atmosphere everywhere -- as the world turns.
All Bush wants is oil.
2006-12-11 12:30:12 · answer #6 · answered by Reba K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no solustion for this situation in Iraq .
because Mr.Bush simply like achild with his doll Mr.Bush think the war in Iraq his war and did not like to listen to any advice beside that he behave exactly like a doctator he did not like to hear another openion or bad news so the problem will bigger and bigger
NOTE :all Doctator behave like children always they complain and CRY
2006-12-14 05:19:49 · answer #7 · answered by abu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a dull thing to say. Like everything else is just perfect. What about just nuke the planet and start from scratch.. That would be the better solution. Because no matter what, no matter where you LIVE, idiots will kill idiots in the name arrogant freedom, over everyone. You can see the dilemma, unless your just dense. loose the ego.
2006-12-11 11:48:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If nuking Iraq is on any policy maker's list of "options" they are insane.
2006-12-11 22:55:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first element that needs to take position is for us - individuals - to have an uncomplicated communique of what's somewhat occurring and what's purely right for us as a rustic. the present aspect of debate is abysmal. For a initiate, Iraq , at the same time as truly in conflict, isn't engaged in civil warfare. that's purely no longer precise. There are wallet of lively, violent insurgency because Syria and Iran are funding and imparting a proxy warfare adversarial to us. The concept that we can purely %. up and go away is previous naive, it truly is flat out stupid. the effects are too grave to imagine. a thanks to end this warfare is way less annoying than you are able to imagine. If ALL factions would get in the back of this warfare attempt, positioned the troops first and your irrational hatred of this president on the lower back burner (a minimum of till we preserve this employer), deliver in extra (sure,extra) troops for one almighty purge of the country we would then have a quite reliable challenge to quit to the Iraqis and shall we get the hell out of there. end hating Bush...initiate loving your u . s .!
2016-11-25 21:39:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋