when you consider the trouble they had at the start of the season with this dodgy iranian take over and a couple of suspect transfers parked on their doorstep you cant really blame pardew for the hammers troubles. you need to take a look further up the hammers ladder to see who was to blame.
gready chairman. nice cut for him out of the sale. the team also lost a bit of heart when the argies where forced onto them. a lot of players did really well last season where thinking they wouldnt be rewarded for their hard work when tevez and co turned up. any player would loose a bit of heart if a couple of so called future greats turned up.
2006-12-12 01:21:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a results based business. 6 loses out of the last 7. Now's the time to change before the transfer window opens. If the change in manager comes off and West Ham stay up then YES it was. It's not really about Pardew being sacked but who replaces him.
2006-12-11 13:35:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by swiftgfc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you kidding, Alan Pardew could have saved West Ham but now they are for the drop. Its not the Manager's fault its the highly paid prima donna Players. If they want to get rid of a manager the best thing to do is not play good football and lose. Like they will on Sat against MU
2006-12-11 22:03:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steveh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The West Ham board will hire Ian Dowie. Terry Venables is sixty 4 years old and could not take the activity. Sven won't take the activity. David O'Leary and Glen Hoddle prefer to be the subsequent supervisor of the Hammers. Alan Curbishley is a stable chum of Alan Pardew he won't prefer to artwork with the present West Ham board of directors.
2016-12-11 07:14:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Alan Pardew should not have been sacked.
West Ham will now appoint Ian Dowie.
2006-12-12 01:38:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Danny99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely not. Being a West Ham supporter for over 40 years I can tell you that he was our best asset at the moment. Some of the players don't deserve to be in the first team. He lived and died for us and even if Curbs comes and tries to save us he won't do a better job than Alan. It's a shame but I guess when you've sunk £85 million in a club you get jittery after the defeats we'd had.
2006-12-11 10:47:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pagan Man 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Pardew should have stayed. The January transfer window is nearly on us so he could have made some changes. Also it hasn't helped that he's had injury's plague his team. But people need to remember that he took Liverpool (my team :-) ) right to the wire in the fa cup final & I admit they had a right to win it. Pardew has had my respect since then
2006-12-12 04:55:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no given more time west ham would have turned it around youve only got to look at the way they beat arsenal recently to know there not a bad side and pardew is not a bad manager its the wrong decision
2006-12-11 10:52:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by nick r 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not being funny but every manager needs time .. Newcastle proved that what with Souness and Daglish ...... (although I don't think Souness would have got it right no matter how long!)
They have just been taken over and money matters so they can get who they want
I want to wish Alan Pardew a quickreturn to football management because he is straight talking and a great bloke
2006-12-11 10:54:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by toon_tigger 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
no. never, alan pardew was the one who brought them up from the championship all the way to the no.9 spot last year. and he did it without mega superstars. magnusson lacks patience and i don't understand why did he sack such a good manager? he was suppose to help the team by the takeover, but not making it more chaotic. with man u up next, and without pardew, they can forget about getting anything away from man u. thanks magnusson for giving fergie such a easy time, i'm a man u fan =)
2006-12-11 17:44:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋