English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It goes along with what democrats have been saying all along.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html

2006-12-11 10:21:54 · 15 answers · asked by Mister E 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Because he wrote it himself?

Go back and look at the balanced budget? Get your head out of you *** and actually look up what his balanced budget was. He stole the money out of SS and added it to the general fund. In a year he had a 60,000,000,000 deficit when he added SS funds he ended up with a 30,000,000,000 surplus. Number twisting at it's finest! What was the debt when he came into office, and what was it when he left office?

2006-12-11 10:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

please think before you post.

First, I can guarantee you Bill Clinton had the power of editor over anything published about him on the whitehouse's website. No one in their right mind would greenlight a unflattering bio.

Second, I bet you each president's bio speaks in the same kinds of loving terms. The White house website is intended to be non partisan, meaning neither Democrats nor republicans should be offended by the content.

Third, many of Clinton's accomplishments are acknowledged by Republicans. We agree that the economy grew and that we were more or less at peace. We disagree on issues of taxation, his own immoral behavior in office, his subsequent commission of perjury(for which he WAS disbarred as an attorney), and on the way he handled conflicts like the Waco affair, the 1st world Trade center Bombing, and other "precursor" terrorist attacks. These are POLICY disagreements, which have nothing to do with whether or not he was a nice guy

Will Democrats quit trying to paint President Bush as a Nazi and acknowledge his accomplishments? Like tax relief, prescription medicine relief for the elderly, etc.?

2006-12-11 18:42:39 · answer #2 · answered by chocolahoma 7 · 3 2

The "Whitehouse" does not say anything, it is an inanimate object. The Clinton history revisionists write that gibberish and they are free to omit whatever they want to in order to portray a legacy.

Clinton, is nothing but a lucky punk who was controlled by a republican congress, while diddling around on his wife, and making half hearted attempts to bomb terrorists who attacked our nation and our sovereign property.

He is a looser, and he has a lot to answer for, but he never will.

2006-12-11 19:32:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

And for George Sr it ends with.....

Bush was unable to withstand discontent at home from a faltering economy, rising violence in inner cities, and continued high deficit spending. In 1992 he lost his bid for reelection to Democrat William Clinton.


His son has made the deficit 60 times larger and the Neocons keep telling the uneducated that it doesn't matter and they believe it,

You actually have people who believe that Bush Jr got us out of the recession of Clinton's, When Clinton was in, everyone had a choice of jobs, You actually have people who believe Bush cut your taxes, the Average family of 4 owes $120,000 and growing plus interest EACH to the government, You know, you do not have real growth with a deficit, you have all false growth with a huge deficit, The ecomomy will never really grow.

You actually have people who say the deficit is just an excuse for liberals to raise taxes, my god, I am just amazed how uneducated SOME PEOPLE are..


Were deeply in debt by cuts to the rich, guess who is going to have to pay it back


BOTTOM LINE the last 5 years the republicans have controlled the House, Senate and Presidency and had a 7 to 2 advantage on the supreme court, they have nobody left to blame

2006-12-11 18:30:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jon J 4 · 3 4

How come it doesn't say anything about Monica and the hummers? Why no reference to the lies he told to the Grand Jury? How come there's no mention of Billybob and Hillary (better known as Bonnie and Clyde - and Hillary is Clyde) looting the White House on the way out the door? I GET IT, IT WAS WRITTEN BY SANDY BERGER AND RICHARD CLARKE, TWO REALLY HONEST GUYS (I didn't really mean the last 4 words for those of you who don't understand Irony).

2006-12-11 18:28:50 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 3 3

Who said anything about the Republicans not believing this? I don't see a link saying that part.

2006-12-11 18:52:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

We believe it, but you do understand that the Republicans were in control of Congress, so he didn't do these things alone, as some would try to make you believe. Clinton's biggest failure is Hillary. Why do you think he cheated?

2006-12-11 18:31:42 · answer #7 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 3 4

Yes, CSI has investigated the stains in the oval office, and on many Democrat Congressmen, and proved that it's Bill Clinton's DNA.
(None of Bill's DNA was ever found on Hillary.)
I BELIEVE!!!! I BELIEVE!!!!!!

2006-12-11 18:28:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

He said "the era of big government is over"?

If he knew then what he knows now.

2006-12-11 18:26:32 · answer #9 · answered by Nunya B 4 · 1 1

Republicans hate Clinton because Limbaugh and Hannity do. It really is that simple.

2006-12-11 18:32:34 · answer #10 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers