English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-11 10:05:38 · 20 answers · asked by IRunWithScissors 3 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

I don't know about classic, but it is clearly antisemitic. The title alone is biased against Israel.

2006-12-11 11:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 15 4

It has no longer something to do with taking sides; it has each and every thing to do with historic, political, and psychological honesty. In his e book, he tells many a million/2-truths and outright lies to make it look that Israel is carefully at fault, while that's Israel who fights defensively to guard herself against terrorists and fascists whose sole purpose in existence is to slaughter her people. Carter accuses Israel of apartheid and racism, yet Israel facilitates all electorate from all religious backgrounds into her politics and lifestyle, mutually as the PLO and Hamas have the two declared that no Jew born after "the Zionist invasion" (1917) could ever be a citizen of "Palestine." Carter gets too plenty credit for Camp David. start up risked his u . s . and Sadat guess his existence on the Camp David accords. Carter merely took the credit. His artwork with Habitat for Humanity is incredible, yet his anti-Israel and anti-Jewish bias is appalling.

2016-12-30 06:58:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I guess people forget how President Carter brought the Egyptians and Israeli's together for an historic peace agreement. That he has spent his entire private life making the world a better place for all of us, and he doesn't just talk, he get's things done.

2006-12-11 11:04:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I haven't read his new one- but I seriously loved his one from last year "Endangered Values". Fantastic!

Jimmy Carter doesn't strike me as the least bit anti-semetic. And much of what our current administration has done to 'support' Israel- is not stuff that Israel even believes is in its best interest.

Sounds like a book worth reading.

2006-12-11 10:09:14 · answer #4 · answered by Morey000 7 · 7 0

Yes. Jimmy Carter is involved in a fiendish plot to raise Adolf Hitler from the dead and bring about the fourth reich.

2006-12-11 10:07:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Actually no, it is a *modern* case of anti-Semitism. It used to be that people who hated Jews just came out and said it. Now they try really hard to disguise their Jew-hatred in anti-Israelism and anti-Zionism. It doesn't take long, however, to find their true motivation, though.

2006-12-11 11:08:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Many Israeli people say what president Carter is saying

2006-12-11 11:10:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Are you playing the "holocaust" card as analogous to when Black people get accused of playing the race card to divert attention from a reality?

2006-12-11 10:18:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

No, it's not even remotely anti-semitic. It's the best plan for peace we have, but unfortunately everyone is denouncing it.

2006-12-11 10:06:56 · answer #9 · answered by braennvin2 5 · 9 0

YES

It took a few years but the cat is out of the bag Carter is a Jew basher.

I was amazed He did so well with that house building thing. But it was only a matter of time until he started waving a copy of the Learned Elders of Zion

Go big Red Go

2006-12-11 10:21:52 · answer #10 · answered by 43 3 · 3 5

Maybe he's trying to introduce some sense into the argument?
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/israel/palestin.htm

2006-12-11 10:09:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

fedest.com, questions and answers